McPike v. West
| Decision Date | 31 October 1879 |
| Citation | 71 Mo. 199 |
| Parties | MCPIKE v. WEST et al., Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Knox Circuit Court.--HON. JNO. C. ANDERSON, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
O. D. Jones for appellant.
This was a suit to enjoin the defendants from unlawfully opening a road over the premises of plaintiff, and from cutting his timber and hedges and removing his fences for that purpose, thereby exposing his crops and fruit trees and meadows and pasture lands to the depredations of stock of all kinds. A temporary injunction was granted by the judge of the probate court under the seventeenth section of the act of 1873, (Session Acts, 1873, p. 170), it appearing from the affidavit of the plaintiff that the circuit court of the county was not in session, and that the judge of said court was not within the county. Some informalities attended the approval of the bond by the probate judge. At the hearing in the circuit court the injunction was made perpetual. As the petition was regularly filed with the circuit clerk and the circuit court took cognizance of the cause and tried the same, and rendered a final judgment therein, the regularity of the preliminary proceedings is not material, and it will, therefore, not be necessary to notice the various objections thereto made by the defendant. The petition states a good cause of action In addition to the injury threatened, it alleges the insolvency of all the defendants save the road overseers. No allegation of insolvency was necessary, however, as the facts stated show that the injury threatened would have been irreparable, within the legal definition of that term. McKinzie v. Mathews, 59 Mo. 99; Carpenter v. Grisham, 59 Mo. 247; State Savings Bank v. Kercheval, 65 Mo. 682. The testimony introduced on the trial was conflicting, but after carefully reviewing it, we are not prepared to say that the conclusion reached by the circuit court was wrong. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sikes v. Turner
... ... relief. Section 3649, Revised Statutes 1899, now section ... 1969, Revised Statutes 1919; McPike v. West, 71 Mo ... 199; Turner v. Stewart, 78 Mo. 480; Echelkamp v ... Schrader, 45 Mo. 505, and Heman v. Wade, 74 ... Mo.App. 339, are cited in ... ...
-
Henry Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Company v. St. Louis, Keokuk And Northwestern Railroad Company
... ... injunction, until the damage to plaintiff's proprietary ... rights is ascertained and paid. Carpenter v ... Gresham, 59 Mo. 247; McPike v. West, 71 Mo ... 199; McElroy v. Kansas City, 21 F. 257; Railroad ... v. Witherow, 82 Ala. 195; Weyl v. Railroad, 69 ... Cal. 202; Macon v ... ...
-
Russell v. Grant
...Jr., sec. 1357; High on Injunctions [3 Ed.], sec. 481; Spellman on Extraordinary Relief, sec. 349; Turner v. Stewart, 78 Mo. 480; McPike v. West, 71 Mo. 199. (2) mechanic's lien is the creation of statute, and proceedings to enforce it are unknown, either at law or in equity. At every stage......
-
Hatton v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Company
... ... prior to the year 1882, it formed a part of what was known as ... the Lawrence Branch of the Santa Fe Railway, and ran west ... from Pleasant Hill to Lawrence, Kansas; that subsequently, ... also at an indefinite date, it became the property of the ... defendant and was ... similar sort, would be special reasons taking the case out of ... the general rule and bringing it within the statute. [McPike ... v. West, 71 Mo. 199.] But nothing is clearer than that when ... we pass beyond the usual domain of equity, but invoke its ... interference ... ...