O'Meara v. Beasley
Decision Date | 04 July 1949 |
Docket Number | 4-8857 |
Citation | 221 S.W.2d 882,215 Ark. 665 |
Parties | O'Meara v. Beasley |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal fro Miller Circuit Court; Dexter Bush, Judge.
Reversed.
J Ed Morneau, for appellant.
Appellant, Robert W. O'Meara, was drilling for oil at a location in Little River county about eight miles north of Texarkana, Arkansas, in August, 1946. Hershel L Williams, Clyde Redl, Noel A. Beasley, and F. G. Tisdale members of the drilling crew, had started to work in Williams' automobile with Redl driving about 11:00 p. m. August 21, 1946, when the car in which they were riding collided with another automobile resulting in Williams' death and injury to the other three occupants.
Claims for compensation benefits were filed with the Workmen's Compensation Commission by Hershel Williams' widow and the three injured employees. The commission found that the death of Williams and the injuries sustained by the other claimants did not arise out of and in the course of their employment and said claims were denied after hearings before one commissioner and the full commission.
On appeal to circuit court, the findings and order of the commission were reversed and compensation in the amount of $ 7,000 was ordered paid in a lump sum to the widow of Hershel L. Williams and the other three claims were remanded to the commission to determine the sole question of the amount of compensation due them. The employer and his insurance carrier have appealed.
After extensive findings of fact, the commission reached the following "conclusions of law":
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McCollum v. Rogers
...The governing rule of law was applied in Cerrato v. McGeorge Contracting Co., 206 Ark. 1045, 178 S.W.2d 247, and O'Meara v. Beasley, 215 Ark. 665, 221 S.W.2d 882. In both those cases the injury occurred while fellow employees were riding together, but the Commission found that the transport......
-
Frank Lyon Co. v. Oats
...'Injuries', § 81-1302(d), Ark.Stats.2 For some Arkansas cases involving application of the 'going and coming rule', see O'Meara v. Beasley, 215 Ark. 665, 221 S.W.2d 882; Stroud v. Gurdon Lbr. Co., 206 Ark. 490, 177 S.W.2d 181; Cerrato v. McGeorge Contracting Co., 206 Ark. 1045, 178 S.W.2d 2......
-
Wayne Holden & Co. v. Waggoner
...the course and scope of the employment. See generallyMcCollum v. Rogers, 238 Ark. 499, 382 S.W.2d 892 (1964) ; O'Meara v. Beasley, 215 Ark. 665, 221 S.W.2d 882 (1949) ; Cerrato v. McGeorge Contracting Co., 206 Ark. 1045, 178 S.W.2d 247 (1944). On the other hand, the Arkansas Supreme Court h......
-
Thornton v. Texarkana Cotton Oil Corp.
...same rule was also announced by this court in Penny et al. v. Hudson Dairy et al., 218 Ark. 594, 237 S.W.2d 893 and in O'Meara v. Beasley, 215 Ark. 665, 221 S.W.2d 882. To like effect, appellant also agrees with the statement of the law announced by the Commission in these words: 'we think ......