Mears v. Long

Citation149 A.D.3d 823,52 N.Y.S.3d 124
Parties Robert MEARS, et al., respondents, v. Christopher LONG, also known as Chris Long, et al., appellants.
Decision Date12 April 2017
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

149 A.D.3d 823
52 N.Y.S.3d 124

Robert MEARS, et al., respondents,
v.
Christopher LONG, also known as Chris Long, et al., appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

April 12, 2017.


52 N.Y.S.3d 125

Rabinowitz, Galina & Rosen, Mineola, NY (Gayle A. Rosen of counsel), for appellants.

Anthony W. Core, P.C., Westbury, NY (Michael E. White and Bradley Slover of counsel), for respondents.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SANDRA L. SGROI and HECTOR D. LaSALLE, JJ.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and conversion, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), dated May 14, 2015, which granted the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike their answer and for leave to enter a default judgment against them based on their failure to comply with court-ordered discovery.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The nature and degree of the sanction to be imposed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is within the broad discretion of the motion court (see Parker Waichman, LLP v. Laraia, 131 A.D.3d 1215, 1216, 16 N.Y.S.3d 774 ; Lazar, Saders, Thaler & Assoc., LLP v. Lazar, 131 A.D.3d 1133, 16 N.Y.S.3d 326 ; Wolf v. Flowers, 122 A.D.3d 728, 996 N.Y.S.2d 169 ). The striking of a pleading may be appropriate where there is a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands or court-ordered discovery is willful and contumacious (see Lucas v. Stam, 147 A.D.3d 921, 48 N.Y.S.3d 150 ; Shah v. Oral Cancer Prevention Int., Inc., 138 A.D.3d 722, 724, 30 N.Y.S.3d 154 ; Lazar, Saders, Thaler & Assoc., LLP v. Lazar, 131 A.D.3d at 1133, 16 N.Y.S.3d 326 ; Brandenburg v. County of Rockland Sewer Dist. 1, State of N.Y., 127 A.D.3d 680, 681, 6 N.Y.S.3d 570 ). The willful and contumacious character of a party's conduct can be inferred from the party's repeated failure to comply with discovery demands or orders without a reasonable excuse (see Lucas v. Stam, 147 A.D.3d 921, 48 N.Y.S.3d 150 ; Lazar, Saders, Thaler & Assoc., LLP v. Lazar, 131 A.D.3d at 1134, 16 N.Y.S.3d 326 ; Brandenburg v. County

52 N.Y.S.3d 126
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Henry v. Atlantis Rehab. & Residential Healthcare Facility, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 26, 2021
    ...be inferred from the party's repeated failure to comply with discovery demands or orders without a reasonable excuse" ( Mears v. Long, 149 A.D.3d 823, 823–824, 52 N.Y.S.3d 124 ). Here, the plaintiff established that the defendants failed to comply with its demand for discovery and inspectio......
  • Westervelt v. Westervelt
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 25, 2018
    ...of the sanction to be imposed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is within the broad discretion of the motion court" ( Mears v. Long, 149 A.D.3d 823, 823, 52 N.Y.S.3d 124 ; see Wolf v. Flowers, 122 A.D.3d 728, 996 N.Y.S.2d 169 ). " ‘The drastic remedy of striking a pleading is warranted wher......
  • Sparakis v. Gozzer Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 27, 2019
    ...807, 911 N.Y.S.2d 117 ; see CPLR 3126[3] ; Studer v. Newpointe Estates Condominium, 152 A.D.3d 555, 557, 58 N.Y.S.3d 509 ; Mears v. Long, 149 A.D.3d 823, 823, 52 N.Y.S.3d 124 ; Roug Kang Wang v. Chien–Tsang Lin, 94 A.D.3d 850, 852, 941 N.Y.S.2d 717 ). Here, Aktor's willful and contumacious ......
  • Acuhealth Acupuncture, P.C. v. Country-Wide Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 12, 2017
    ...of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Velasquez, J.), dated December 15, 2014, which granted the petition, vacated the award of the master 52 N.Y.S.3d 124arbitrator, and reinstated and confirmed the award of the arbitrator.ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the award ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT