Mechanics' Bank v. Klein

Citation33 Mo. 559
PartiesTHE MECHANICS' BANK, Respondent, v. PHILIP KLEIN et al., Appellants.
Decision Date31 March 1863
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

H. N. Hart, for appellants.

Lackland, Cline and Jamison, for respondent.

This was an action brought by the Mechanics' Bank, based on a lease alleged to have been executed on the 15th day of November, 1858, whereby said bank leased to Charles De Wald, Philip Klein, and Constant Schnerr, certain premises in the city of St. Louis, being the basement story of the building situated on the southwest corner of Third and Chesnut streets; that among other things the said De Wald, Klein and Schnerr covenanted to pay plaintiff for said premises an annual rent of eight hundred dollars, that is to say, two hundred dollars on the first day of April, July, October, and January, of each and every year during said term. That it was also agreed and stipulated in said lease, that if said rent should at any time become due and remain unpaid, it should bear interest at the rate of ten per cent. per annum from the time the same became due until paid.

The petition further states, that on the 25th of June, 1859, the said De Wald, Klein and Schnerr, by their deed in writing under seal of that date, for value received, did convey and transfer unto Philip Schladtweiler the deed of lease and the premises therein described, given by the Mechanics' Bank as aforesaid, to have and to hold the same, with all of the covenants therein contained, and subject to the rents therein contained; that for value received said Philip Schladtweiler, Philip Klein, and Peter Wegman, executed said deed of assignment on said day last aforesaid, whereby said defendants, Philip Schladtweiler as principal and Philip Klein and Peter Wegman as securities, covenanted and agreed to and with the Mechanics' Bank to pay the rent as aforesaid in said deed of lease specified, and at the times therein stated, and to do and perform all of the covenants therein contained; that there is due on account of the rent of said premises the sum of four hundred dollars for two quarters, ending on the 1st of January, 1860, and prays judgment against the defendants, Schladtweiler, Klein and Wegman, for said amount, with ten per cent. interest.

The answer to this petition, by Klein and Wegman, stated that they are not liable to the Mechanics' Bank, as alleged in their said petition, in any sum whatever on the assignment set forth in the petition, or by virtue of anything...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1910
    ...ground lodged in the motion for a new trial and by a bill (Sternberg v. Levy, supra; Godfrey v. Godfrey, 228 Mo. 507, 128 S.W. 970; Bank v. Klein, 33 Mo. 559); that a motion quash the proceedings is in the same category (Tarkio v. Clark, 186 Mo. 285, 85 S.W. 329); that a motion to strike ou......
  • State v. Owens
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 3, 1918
    ... ... trial and by a bill (Sternberg v. Levy, supra; Godfrey v ... Godfrey, 228 Mo. 507; Bank v. Klein, 33 Mo ... 559); [200 Mo.App. 476] that a motion to quash the ... proceedings is in the ... ...
  • Nodaway Drainage District Number One v. Illinois Surety Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1913
    ... ... rel. v. Burckhardt, 83 Mo. 430; Bollinger v ... Carrier, 79 Mo. 318; Bank v. Allen, 68 Mo. 474; ... State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1; Railroad v ... Carlisle, 94 Mo. 166; ... 142; ... Sternberg v. Levy, 159 Mo. 624; Godfrey v ... Godfrey, 228 Mo. 507; Bank v. Klein, 33 Mo ... 559; Tarkio v. Clark, 186 Mo. 285; Bick v ... Dry, 134 Mo.App. 589; State v ... ...
  • Shohoney v. Quincy, O. & K. C. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1910
    ...the motion for a new trial and by a bill (Sternberg v. Levy, supra; Godfrey v. Godfrey, 128 S. W. 970, not yet officially reported; Bank v. Klein, 33 Mo. 559); that a motion to quash the proceedings is in the same category (City of Tarkio v. Clark, 186 Mo. 285, 85 S. W. 329); that a motion ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT