Medlock v. Barfield, 35164

Decision Date05 October 1954
Docket NumberNo. 2,No. 35164,35164,2
Citation90 Ga.App. 759,84 S.E.2d 113
PartiesRufus MEDLOCK v. Frank BARFIELD et al
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

An owner of an automobile who knowingly permits his vehicle to be operated by an untrained and unlicensed driver who was learning to drive is not relieved of liability for damages resulting from the operator's incompetence by the fact that the operator was then driving outside of the area in which the owner had given him permission to drive.

Frank Barfield and John Jackson brought suits against Rufus Medlock before a justice of the peace. They alleged that Medlock negligently permitted an untrained driver, Will Taylor, Jr., to drive his automobile, and that Taylor, negligently drove Medlock's automobile along Pine Avenue in Albany, across and ten feet beyond the curb, striking Barfield's parked automobile and Jackson's too, with resulting damage. Medlock's answer was that he loaned Taylor his car to drive around the block, and that Taylor, without Medlock's authority, drove the automobile at least six blocks away from where he was authorized to drive it, by reason of which facts Medlock contended he was liable to the plaintiffs.

The justice of the peace found for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed to the superior court. The parties agreed for the case to be tried before the judge without a jury on the following stipulation: 'Defendant owned automobile and desired to help Will Taylor learn to drive so that Will Taylor could secure a job and driver's license. Taylor is 16 years of age and unrelated to defendant. On July 9, 1953, defendant drove Taylor out to State Patrol Station for Taylor to be examined for driver's license. After the examination the State Patrol declined to give Taylor a license. This was on a Friday. The following Monday, defendant drove Taylor out to the west section of Cherry Street in Albany, Georgia, which section was not heavily traveled, and after reaching said section defendant drove Taylor around the block twice. After completion of the second trip around the block defendant got out of the automobile, stood on the edge of the road, and told Taylor to drive around the block again. Taylor drove around the block, came back to where the defendant was, and defendant asked him how he was doing. Taylor said he was doing all right, whereupon defendant told him to drive around the block again. Taylor drove around the block, came back, and defendant told him to drive around the block again. Taylor left the place where the defendant was standing and drove approximately eight blocks into a heavily traveled area and was grossly negligence in damaging plaintiff's parked automobiles in the sum of $306.18.'

The court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in the agreed amount of the damages, and refused a new trial sought by the defendant upon the general grounds. The defendant excepts to the latter judgment.

Robert W. Reynolds, Albany, for plaintiff in error.

Eugene C. Black, Louis Peacock, Albany, for defendants in error.

NICHOLS, Judge.

The defendant Medlock admits that Taylor was negligent, was an untrained driver, and had permission to drive Medlock's automobile in a specified area; and that Medlock knew Taylor was an untrained driver. Medlock concedes his liability if Taylor had driven into the plaintiffs' automobiles while driving around the block designated. He contends that Taylor was a bailee of the car for the sole purpose of driving it around the block and, in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Ditmyer v. American Liberty Ins. Co., 43155
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 28, 1968
    ...390; Burks v. Green, 85 Ga.App. 327, 69 S.E.2d 686; Windsor v. Chanticleer & Co., 89 Ga.App. 116, 78 S.E.2d 871, supra; Medlock v. Barfield, 90 Ga.App. 759, 84 S.E.2d 113; Healan v. Powell, 91 Ga.App. 787, 87 S.E.2d 332; Mason v. Powell, 92 Ga.App. 496, 88 S.E.2d 734; Jones v. Dixie Drive I......
  • Brown v. Sheffield
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 26, 1970
    ...47; Windsor v. Chanticleer & Co., 89 Ga.App. 116, 78 S.E.2d 871; Caskey v. Underwood, 89 Ga.App. 418, 79 S.E.2d 558; Medlock v. Barfield, 90 Ga.App. 759, 84 S.E.2d 113; Garver v. Smith, 90 Ga.App. 892, 896, 84 S.E.2d 693; Healan v. Powell, 91 Ga.App. 787, 87 S.E.2d 332; Mason v. Powell, 92 ......
  • Willis v. Hill, 42881
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 10, 1967
    ...Bottling Co. v. Knott, 47 Ga.App. 539, 171 S.E. 151; Christian v. Columbus & Rome Ry. Co., 79 Ga. 460, 7 S.E. 216; Medlock v. Barfield, 90 Ga.App. 759, 84 S.E.2d 113; Gay v. Healan, 88 Ga.App. 533, 537, 77 S.E.2d 47. With respect to the first duty, the employer's tort liability is indirect,......
  • U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Evans
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1967
    ...have held it to be negligence knowingly to permit one's automobile to be driven by an untrained and unlicensed driver, Medlock v. Barfield, 90 Ga.App. 759, 84 S.E.2d 113; Jones v. Dixie Drive It Yourself System, 97 Ga.App. 669, 104 S.E.2d 497, or knowingly to entrust it to an incompetent dr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT