Medlock v. State

Decision Date09 February 1995
Docket NumberNo. C-91-298,C-91-298
PartiesFloyd Allen MEDLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

Floyd Allen Medlock entered a plea of guilty to First Degree Malice Aforethought Murder before the Honorable Edward C. Cunningham in the District Court of Canadian County, Case No. CRF-90-89. After a hearing to determine the voluntariness and sufficiency of the plea, the district court accepted Medlock's plea of guilty to First Degree Murder. A separate hearing was held to determine sentence. At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing, the district court found the existence of two aggravating circumstances and sentenced Medlock to death.

By published opinion issued on September 30, 1994, this Court affirmed Medlock's conviction and sentence, 887 P.2d 1333. Medlock is now before the Court on a Petition for Rehearing, Rule 3.14, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 22 O.S.Supp.1993, Ch. 18, App.

According to Rule 3.14, a Petition for Rehearing shall be filed for two reasons only:

(1) That some question decisive of the case and duly submitted by the attorney of record has been overlooked by the Court, or

2) That the decision is in conflict with an express statute or controlling decision to which the attention of this Court was not called either in the brief or in oral argument.

Medlock's Petition for Rehearing fails to meet the criteria set forth in Rule 3.14.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THE COURT that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Charles A. Johnson

CHARLES A. JOHNSON

Presiding Judge

/s/ Charles S. Chapel

CHARLES S. CHAPEL

Vice-Presiding Judge

/s/ Gary L. Lumpkin

GARY L. LUMPKIN

Judge

/s/ James F. Lane

JAMES F. LANE

Judge

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Cheney v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • December 8, 1995
    ...100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988).15 Id. 486 U.S. at 363, 108 S.Ct. at 1859.16 Perry v. State, 893 P.2d 521, 533-34 (Okl.Cr.1995); Medlock v. State, 889 P.2d 344 (Okl.Cr.1995); Mitchell v. State, 884 P.2d 1186 (Okl.Cr.1994), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct.95, 133 L.Ed.2d 50 (1995); Hooks v. Stat......
  • Medlock v. Ward
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • January 10, 2000
    ...Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Medlock's conviction and sentence. See Medlock v. State, 887 P.2d 1333, reh'g denied, 889 P.2d 344 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995), cert. denied sub nom. Medlock v. Oklahoma, 516 U.S. 918 (1995). In September of 1996 Medlock filed an application for state post-con......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT