Meeder v. Seabd. Air Line Ry
Decision Date | 28 February 1917 |
Docket Number | (No. 97.) |
Citation | 91 S.E. 527 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | MEEDER v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Warren County; Stacy, Judge.
Action by John A. Meeder against the Seaboard Air Line Railway. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
The issues were as follows:
Did the defendant maliciously or willfully, wantonly, and rudely mistreat and humiliate plaintiff while a passenger on its train? Answer: Yes.
"What, if any, damage, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $200.
Murray Allen, of Raleigh, for appellant.
T. M. Pittman, of Henderson, and B. B. Williams, of Warrenton, for appellee.
The plaintiff sues to recover damages as a passenger because he was wrongfully carried by Ridgeway to Norlina, and for punitive damages because of insulting and humiliating conduct towards plaintiff by conductor of the train.
His honor charged the jury:
To the foregoing charge in parentheses defendant excepts.
The court correctly charged that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover actual damages because he was carried by Ridgeway to Norlina. We think, however, the court erred in submitting the question of punitive damages to the jury, but should have granted the defendant's motion.
The plaintiff testified:
On cross-examination plaintiff testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tripp v. Am. Tobacco Co, (No. 157.)
...N. C. 113, 129 S. E. 151; Webb v. Tel. Co., 167 N. C. 483, 83 S. E. 568; Cottle v. Johnson, 179 N. C. 426, 102 S. E. 769; Meeder v. Railroad, 173 N. C. 57, 91 S. E. 527; Hodges v. Hall, 172 N. C. 29, 89 S. E. 802; Ammons v. Railroad, 140 N. C. 196, 52 S. E. 731; Hansley v. Railroad, 117 N. ......
- Sanders Et Ux v. May