Melton v. State
Decision Date | 09 July 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 42206,42206 |
Parties | Joseph Charles MELTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Maurice U. Westerfeld, Houston (on appeal), for appellant.
Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Thomas C. Dunn, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The offense is assault with intent to commit rape; the punishment, assessed by the court after a verdict of guilty, ten years' confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
The indictment charged the offense of statutory rape. The case was submitted to the jury upon the lesser included offense of assault with intent to rape.
In grounds of error #1, #3 and #4 the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.
Gloria Terrazas, 13, the prosecuting witness who was 12 years old at the time of the alleged offense, testified that she met the appellant shortly after school started in September, 1967; that she went to his garage apartment with Janie Mena, age 12, at approximately 4 o'clock one afternoon; that she and the appellant went into the bedroom where they took off their clothes and that for ten minutes or so while they were on the bed appellant tried to get his private part into hers; that she once told him he was hurting her stomach; that she and Janie stayed in appellant's house for approximately 50 minutes and when they left the appellant gave them $11.00; that she was not the wife of the appellant.
Janie Mena corroborated the prosecutrix's testimony and admitted she had, at appellant's instructions, also taken off her clothes after which time appellant kissed her private part. She related that she was present in the bedroom when appellant had or attempted to have sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix and she observed them kissing each other's sexual parts; that they left only after they had received the money from the appellant.
Dr. Jose Rafael Toledo testified that on or about September 11, 1967, he had examined the prosecutrix, Gloria Terrazas and found she had an infected uterus and that she was not a virgin. He testified, without objection, that she told him she had had sexual experiences with her father and two other men for money; that he placed her in the hospital and notified the police department.
Testifying in his own behalf the 51 year old 1 appellant denied the charge against him and denied knowing the prosecutrix. He admitted that he was acquainted with Janie Mena and had on occasion chased her out of his garage apartment which he claims she entered without permission.
'An assault with intent to rape is constituted by the existence of the facts that bring the offense within the definition of an assault, coupled with an intention to commit the crime of rape.' 48 Tex.Jur.2d, Rape, Sec. 11, p. 643.
48 Tex.Jur.2d, Rape, Sec. 14, p. 646.
We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hernandez v. State
...Clark v. State, 558 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Provost v. State, 514 S.W.2d 269 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Melton v. State, 442 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.Cr.App.1969). We conclude from a review of Lucila Sanchez's trial testimony that the court did not abuse its discretion in permitting her to testify. Co......
-
Lujan v. State
...she swore she was making a promise to tell the truth. She was held to be a competent witness. For similar holdings see Melton v. State, 442 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); Franks v. State, 166 Tex.Crim. 455, 314 S.W.2d 586 (1958); Hines v. State, 160 Tex.Crim. 284, 268 S.W.2d 459 (1954); Ro......
- Perez v. State
-
Fields v. State
...unless an abuse of discretion is shown. 61 Tex.Jr.2d, Witnesses, Secs. 67, 47; 4 Branch's Ann.P.C.2d Sec. 1945, p. 264. Melton v. State, 442 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.Cr.App.1969). While there is some authority (4 Branch's Ann.P.C.2d, Sec. 1945, p. 264) that such rule applies when the witness is over......