Mendel v. Converse & Co, (No. 14123.)
| Decision Date | 27 June 1923 |
| Docket Number | (No. 14123.) |
| Citation | 30 Ga.App. 549,118 S.E. 586 |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | MENDEL. v. CONVERSE & CO. |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
[Ed. Note.—For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Contract.]
[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]
[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]
[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]
[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]
Error from City Court of Atlanta; H. M. Reid, Judge.
Action by Converse & Co. against H. Mendel. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.
Turner & Grove, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
Rosser, Slaton & Hopkins, of Atlanta, for defendant in error.
BELL, J. Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Parrish v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
...135 S.E. 762 36 Ga.App. 133 PARRISH v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. No. 17165.Court of Appeals of Georgia, Second DivisionNovember 15, 1926 ... failed and ought to have been overruled. Mendel v ... Converse & Co., 30 Ga.App. 549 (11), 118 S.E. 586; ... Southern ... ...
-
Parrish v. Cent. Of Ga. Ry. Co
...made by the demurrer was fatal to the entire amendment, the demurrer failed and ought to have been overruled. Mendel v. Converse & Co., 30 Ga. App. 549 (11), 118 S. E. 586; Southern Ry. Co. v. Phillips, 136 Ga. 282 (1), 71 S. E. 414. 3. The evidence authorized the inference that the plainti......
-
Ryals v. Livingston
...v. Fargason, 120 Ga. 708 (6), 48 S. E. 180; Smith Co. v. Strickland Cotton Mills, 6 Ga. App. 522, 65 S. E. 320; Mendel v. Converse & Co., 30 Ga. App. 549 (9), 118 S. E. 586), but the defect in the present petition is the failure to allege any amount of recoverable damages. It is a suit for ......
-
Ryals v. Livingston
...(Ford v. Fargason, 120 Ga. 708 (6), 48 S.E. 180; Smith Co. v. Strickland Cotton Mills, 6 Ga.App. 522, 65 S.E. 320; Mendel v. Converse & Co., 30 Ga.App. 549 (9), 118 S.E. 586), but the in the present petition is the failure to allege any amount of recoverable damages. It is a suit for specia......
Request a trial to view additional results