Mengstu v. Holder, No. 05-71825.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | D. Nelson |
Citation | 560 F.3d 1055 |
Parties | Ruth Aynom MENGSTU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. |
Docket Number | No. 05-71825. |
Decision Date | 27 March 2009 |
v.
Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
[560 F.3d 1056]
Anthony J. Patek, Cooley Godward LLP, San Francisco, CA; Dennis Muchnicki, Dublin, OH, for the petitioner.
Michael Gordon Latour & Andrew Oliveira, Office of Immigration Litigation, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the Government.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A096-146-985.
Before: D.W. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Ruth Aynom Mengtsu petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We grant the petition for review and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Ruth Aynom Mengtsu is an Ethiopian national of Eritrean descent. She was born in 1976 in Asmara, Ethiopia.1 When she was five years old, she moved to Addis Ababa, the Ethiopian capital, with her family. Mengtsu completed high school and studied at a technical school for two years, graduating in 1995. She married, and, in 1999, sought employment because she felt that she "should leave the house and be productive." She was hired as a secretary in a glass work store. The owner, Robel Berhe, was also Eritrean, as were several of his employees.
In May 1998, armed conflict erupted between Ethiopia and Eritrea. During the war, approximately 75,000 Ethiopians of Eritrean origin were forcibly expelled and bused to Eritrea. The justification for these expulsions was simply suspect status as "Eritreans." People in urban areas were frequently arrested in their homes or workplaces. Arrestees were typically interned, often under very harsh conditions, prior to deportation.
In February 1999, Mengstu's husband was deported. According to Mengtsu's testimony, the Ethiopian police "just picked him up and took him away." He was in the business district at the time, and the police were deporting Eritreans in the vicinity.
On March 10, 2000, over a year later, seven or eight members of the Ethiopian police came to Mengtsu's store and stated that all of the Eritreans in the store had to leave the country. The police spoke to Berhe, the owner, who relayed the officers'
statements to the employees. Berhe confirmed that there were Eritreans working in the store, identifying them on a list. The police further stated that the Eritreans should get their identity papers from the Immigration Office.
Mengtsu obtained the identity paper from the Immigration Office on March 15, 2000. She provided the Immigration Judge ("IJ") with a copy of the paper, explaining that it was issued in lieu of a passport and served as "the identity paper to non-Ethiopians, which they considered non-Ethiopians. It's an emergency paper issued to people who had to leave from Ethiopia to go out of the country." The document was titled "Emergency Document of Identity to a non-Ethiopian National who cannot Obtain, or owing to Emergent Circumstances., has no time to Obtain a National Passport or renew an Expired one." (emphasis added). It identified Mengstu as "proceeding to Sudan," and was not valid for reentry to Ethiopia. Her nationality was listed as "Eritrean."
Mengtsu flew from Addis Ababa with Berhe to Khartoum, the capital of the Sudan, on March 25, 2000. Mengtsu showed the Sudanese officials her Ethiopian identity paper and entered the country. There was no Sudanese stamp on her visa, and she was not interviewed by immigration officials.
Shortly after she arrived in the Sudan, Mengtsu went to Abba Kansa, a refugee camp operated by the Red Cross, located outside of Khartoum. She was not directed to the camp by Sudanese officials; she simply believed that she would know people there. She remained there for two years.
When Mengtsu's husband was deported to Eritrea in 1999, he was forcibly conscripted into the Eritrean army. She contacted him by sending letters through traders and by asking people who traveled to Eritrea to send word to him of her whereabouts. He deserted the army and entered the Sudan, smuggling himself into the country illegally in September 2001.
The Sudanese government did not offer Mengtsu or her husband citizenship or permanent residence during their stays. Mengtsu did not open a Sudanese bank account. According to the Human Rights Watch report, the government of the Sudan did not give Eritrean deportees a "warm reception." When asked why she remained there for two years, she stated that she could not find an agent to process her paperwork so that she could leave. Mengtsu eventually procured a false passport, and traveled to the United States, arriving on February 14, 2002.
Mengtsu last contacted her husband, who is still living in the Sudan, about two months prior to her hearing. When asked how he was supporting himself, Mengtsu testified that her husband's living standard was "very, very bad. He just gets along with this one and that one." When asked what would happen if she returned to the Sudan, she stated that she "has nothing there." She stated that she had no job and that she and her husband depleted their funds sending her to the United States.
Mengtsu appeared in removal proceedings and conceded removability. She declined to designate a country of removal and applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The IJ denied Mengtsu's application and designated Ethiopia as the country of removal. The IJ found that Mengtsu was not subject to past persecution because she had been a "war refugee" as defined in the United Nations High Commission for Refugees' Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (1979) (the "Handbook"). He also found that she had firmly resettled in the Sudan. The IJ
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Su Hwa She v. Holder, No. 06-71794
...Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003) (noting that due process claims are reviewed de novo); Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2009). Factual findings, including a determination of firm resettlement, are reviewed for substantial evidence, and are overt......
-
Stserba v. Holder, No. 09–4312.
...the BIA to decide in the first instance whether denationalization that leaves the applicant stateless is persecution); Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1059 (9th Cir.2009) (same). Neither the IJ nor the BIA considered whether Estonia's citizenship law amounted to ethnically targeted denati......
-
Arrey v. Barr, No. 16-73373
...Arrey has been ordered removed not to South Africa—where she allegedly had firmly resettled—but to Cameroon. See Mengstu v. Holder , 560 F.3d 1055, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting finding that Ethiopian firmly resettled in Sudan in part because "[t]he IJ himself designated Ethiopia, rather ......
-
Zhiqiang Hu v. Eric H. Holder Jr., No. 09–70240.
...grounds; and (3) is committed by the government or forces the government is either ‘unable or unwilling’ to control.Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Ernesto Navas, 217 F.3d at 655–56). [652 F.3d 1017] The only element at issue in this case is whether Hu was har......
-
Su Hwa She v. Holder, No. 06-71794
...Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003) (noting that due process claims are reviewed de novo); Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2009). Factual findings, including a determination of firm resettlement, are reviewed for substantial evidence, and are overt......
-
Stserba v. Holder, No. 09–4312.
...the BIA to decide in the first instance whether denationalization that leaves the applicant stateless is persecution); Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1059 (9th Cir.2009) (same). Neither the IJ nor the BIA considered whether Estonia's citizenship law amounted to ethnically targeted denati......
-
Arrey v. Barr, No. 16-73373
...Arrey has been ordered removed not to South Africa—where she allegedly had firmly resettled—but to Cameroon. See Mengstu v. Holder , 560 F.3d 1055, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting finding that Ethiopian firmly resettled in Sudan in part because "[t]he IJ himself designated Ethiopia, rather ......
-
Zhiqiang Hu v. Eric H. Holder Jr., No. 09–70240.
...grounds; and (3) is committed by the government or forces the government is either ‘unable or unwilling’ to control.Mengstu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Ernesto Navas, 217 F.3d at 655–56). [652 F.3d 1017] The only element at issue in this case is whether Hu was har......