Mercantile Trust Co. v. Dulle
Decision Date | 09 April 1926 |
Docket Number | 26177 |
Citation | 282 S.W. 414 |
Parties | MERCANTILE TRUST CO. v. DULLE et al |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
D. W Shackleford, of Jefferson City, Paul Barnett, of Sedalia, D W. Peters, of Jefferson City, and Sam B. Jeffries, Arthur E Simpson, and Paul F. Plummer, all of St. Louis, for appellants.
Sam A. Mitchell, Thompson & Thompson, Guy A. Thompson, and Frank A. Thompson, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
In Banc.
This is an action upon a written instrument, signed by certain directors and stockholders of the Standard Crate & Filler Company, a corporation, guaranteeing the payment of bonds of said corporation. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff (respondent). From the judgment upon such verdict in the sum of $ 186,318.42, certain of the defendants appealed.
There were originally ten defendants. Two of them made default. Two of those for whom answers were filed did not appeal. The appeals of six of the appealing defendants have been dismissed in this court because of settlements with respondent. On the record before us the only remaining appellants are W. A. Dulle and James A. Hill.
The written instrument, signed by all of the original defendants is as follows:
'This guaranty shall remain in full force and be binding upon the undersigned until all of the above-described indebtedness shall have been paid in full.
'The failure of any person or persons, being directors and stockholders of the debtor corporation, to sign this guaranty shall not release or affect the liability of any signer hereof.
(Signatures omitted.)
It appears in evidence that said bonds were delivered to Howard Cook, and that he delivered to the Standard Crate & Filler Company his check for $ 250,000. Said guaranty was delivered to Cook with said bonds.
Prior to the execution of the bonds, of the deed of trust by the corporation, and of the guaranty by the signers, said corporation had given its short term notes to J. M. Hays Industries, a corporation, in the sum of $ 183,000, and J. M. Hays, its president, had deposited the said notes with respondent as collateral security for a note of $ 150,000. Part of the bonds of the corporation was delivered to the Hays Company to take up the said notes of the corporation and Hays substituted, and respondent accepted 175 of said bonds of the par value of $ 175,000, together with certified copy of the foregoing guaranty, as collateral to said note for $ 150,000. Respondent thus became the holder of said bonds. The debtor corporation thereafter became bankrupt and failed to pay the interest on said bonds when due, and this failure constituted default as to the principal of said bonds. Demand was made upon the signers of the guaranty to pay said bonds and interest in accordance with their guaranty. Upon their failure so to pay, this suit was instituted.
Appellants contend that the instrument signed by them and the other original defendants was merely an offer to guarantee the payment of the principal and interest of said bonds, and such guaranty did not become effective until said offer was accepted by Cook as made, and since there is no proof of such acceptance, the signers are not bound thereby. There is no merit in this contention. The proof was that the bonds were executed...
To continue reading
Request your trial