Merriam v. Calhoun
Decision Date | 27 May 1884 |
Citation | 19 N.W. 708,15 Neb. 569 |
Parties | SELDEN N. MERRIAM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. S. H. CALHOUN AND J. H. CROXTON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR to the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before POUND, J.
AFFIRMED.
Watson & Wodehouse, for plaintiff in error, cited: Kepley v Irwin, 14 Neb. 300.
S. H Calhoun, for defendants in error, cited: Newlove v Woodward, 9 Neb. 504.
In January, 1882, the defendants in error commenced an action against the plaintiff in error in the district court of Otoe county to redeem certain lands claimed by them, which had been sold to the plaintiff in error for taxes and a tax deed obtained. The plaintiff in error being a non-resident of the state service was had upon him by publication. At the April term, 1883, of the district court of that county, a decree was rendered by default, in which the court finds that the tax deed is invalid and that the amount of taxes due, with interest at twelve per cent, was the sum of $ 552.40, which the defendants in error were required to pay to the clerk of the court, and thereupon the tax deed was set aside. In July, 1883, the plaintiff in error filed an answer to the petition and filed a motion upon proper notice to set aside the default and be let in to defend. The motion was overruled by the court, and the cause is brought to this court by petition in error.
Sec. 82 of the code provides that
The record contains an affidavit of the defendant, wherein he states that he had no actual notice of the pendency of the action. To show that the defendant had actual notice of the pendency of the action, the plaintiffs introduced in evidence a power of attorney from Selden N. Merriam and wife to W. D Merriam, by which he is constituted their "true and lawful...
To continue reading
Request your trial