Merrick v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 03 July 1916 |
Docket Number | No. 12019.,12019. |
Citation | 189 S.W. 392 |
Parties | MERRICK v. TRAVELERS' INS. CO. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Thos. J. Seehorn, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Ollie B. Merrick against the Travelers' Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Vinton Pike, of St. Joseph, and O. C. Mosman, of Kansas City, for appellant. Sebree, Conrad & Wendorff, of Kansas City, for respondent.
This is an action on a policy of accident insurance issued by defendant to William C. Merrick, a practicing dentist in Kansas City, who died April 24, 1912, while the policy was in force. A rider attached to the policy provided that:
"Subject otherwise to all of its conditions and provisions this policy covers septic poisoning, the result of external inoculation through accidental contact with septic matter."
Plaintiff, who is the widow of the insured and the beneficiary named in the policy, contends that the death of her husband was the result of external inoculation through accidental contact with septic matter, and therefore that she is entitled to the indemity provided in the policy. Defendant denies that such was the cause of the death of the insured, and insists that the evidence of plaintiff fails completely to sustain her action, and leaves the cause of the death in the field of conjecture and speculation. The trial court thought otherwise, denied defendant's request for a directed verdict, and submitted issues of fact to the jury. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff, and defendant appealed.
The facts and circumstances of the last sickness and death of the insured, disclosed by the evidence of plaintiff, were as follows: Merrick apparently was in good health, but had been afflicted for two weeks or more with a slight cold and its attendant inflammation of the nasal mucous membrane, but the cold and inflammation had almost disappeared at the time of his alleged infection. He was working in his office on the teeth of a patient who was suffering from a virulent and advanced attack of pyorrhea, a disease which causes the formation and oozing of pus at the base of the affected teeth. The patient suddenly coughed with explosive violence, ejecting a spray of saliva into the doctor's face. The assistant to the doctor testified that:
He was fitting a bridge in the patient's mouth and his face
The next day the doctor and Mrs. Merrick attended a matinee, and on leaving the theater he complained of a headache. After returning home, the pain which was in the forehead just above the nose seemed to increase and extended around to the ear. He slept little that night. The next day he dressed, but reclined all day and suffered from the pain, which did not abate. The next morning, which was Monday, he went to the office to keep an appointment, but returned home at 1 o'clock in a taxicab and was suffering intensely from the pain in his forehead and car. He went to bed and had the family physician called, who made an examination. The physician testified:
A specialist, Dr. Hamilton, was called in to treat the nose, and other doctors were called in consultation. In time the pain decreased, but the patient gradually grew weaker and developed symptoms of mental aberration. Constantly but gradually he grew worse and died April 24th, about three months...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
... ... as a cause." Ward v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of ... Hartford , 82 Neb. 499, 118 N.W. 70, 72 ... The ... following cases also ... v. Lloyd , 165 Ind. 52, 73 N.E. 824; ... Thornton v. Travelers' Ins. Co. , 116 ... Ga. 121, 42 S.E. 287, 94 Am. St. Rep. 99; Modern Woodmen ... Accid. Ass'n ... 178, 12 C. C. A. 544, 27 U.S ... App. 547, 27 L. R. A. 629, 24 Ins. Law Rep. 430; ... Merrick v. Travelers' Ins. Co. , Mo ... App., 189 S.W. 392, 49 Ins. Law Jour. 103; Hanley v ... ...
-
Caldwell v. Travelers Ins. Company
... ... Assn., 126 Mo. 104; ... Bellows v. Travelers Ins. Co., 203 S.W. 978; ... Berryman v. Southern Surety Co., 285 Mo. 379; ... Fetter v. Fid. & Cas. Co., 174 Mo. 256; Young v ... Ry. Mail Assn., 126 Mo.App. 325; Beile v. Travelers ... Prot. Assn., 155 Mo.App. 629; Merrick v. Travelers ... Ins. Co., 189 S.W. (Mo. App.) 392; Sommers v. Ins ... Assn., 84 Mo.App. 605; Hooper v. Standard L. & A ... Ins. Co., 166 Mo.App. 209; Anderson v. Mutual ... Benefit, 231 S.W. App.) 75; Andrus v. Bus. Men's ... Acc. Assn., 283 Mo. 442; Goodes v. Order United Com ... ...
-
Brannaker v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
... ... Fidelity & Casualty Co., 176 Mo. 253, 75 S.W. 1102; ... O'Connor v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co., 208 ... Mo.App. 46, 232 S.W. 218; Merrick v. Travelers Ins ... Co., 189 S.W. 392; Christ v. Pacific Mutual Life ... Ins. Co., 312 Ill. 525, 144 N.E. 161; Rissman & Sons ... v. Ind. Comm., ... ...
-
Caldwell v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
...resulted by accidental means. The case presents a situation quite similar to that in the case at bar. Merrick v. Travelers' Insurance Co. (Mo. App.) 189 S. W. 392 (Kansas City, 1916): Insured was a dentist. The evidence tended to show that he became infected with germs present in pyorrhea a......