Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington
| Decision Date | 13 May 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1588,79-1588 |
| Citation | 392 So.2d 911 |
| Parties | METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Gloria Y. YELVINGTON and James O. Yelvington, her husband, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Thomas Goldstein, Asst. County Atty., for appellant.
James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Mrs. Yelvington slipped on an algae-coated boat launching ramp at Pelican Harbor, a recreational facility operated and maintained by Metropolitan Dade County. 1 She and her husband sued the County for damages arising from her injuries. A jury returned a verdict in favor of these plaintiffs and specially found that Mrs. Yelvington was sixty per cent negligent. From the trial court's judgment thereon both sides have appealed, and we affirm.
The County asserts first, that Section 375.251, Florida Statutes (1975), relieves it of any duty of care toward any person who goes onto Pelican Harbor or any park area which it provides. This contention was rejected in McPhee v. Dade County, 362 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and is rejected here. 2
The County's second argument is that Mrs. Yelvington's negligence in failing to look out for her own safety in the face of the open and obvious algae condition precludes the plaintiffs from recovering any damages. This argument is similarly rejected. The slippery algae condition on the boat launching ramp was not, as a matter of law, so open and obvious as to completely relieve the defendant of liability. See, e. g., Rice v. Florida Power & Light Co., 363 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 460 (Fla.1979). Nor can it be said that, as a matter of law, the defendant was not chargeable with any knowledge of the danger. See, e. g., Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. v. Conway, 358 So.2d 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). To the extent that Mrs. Yelvington was negligent in not perceiving the danger created by the County, her negligence was not a bar to recovery, but rather was reflected in the jury's special verdict on comparative negligence. See Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So.2d 431 (Fla.1973); Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla.1977); Pittman v. Volusia County, 380 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Cf. Auburn Machine Works Co., Inc. v. Jones, 366 So.2d 1167 (Fla.1979) (). Where a possessor of land should anticipate the harm which may be caused by a condition on the land, he may be liable despite the obviousness of the hazard. Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 343A.
On their cross-appeal, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Monteville v. Terrebonne Parish Consol. Government
...v. Stamm, 448 So.2d 39, 41 (Fla.App.1984); cf. Chapman v. Pinellas County, 423 So.2d 578 (Fla.App.1982); Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So.2d 911 (Fla.App.) pet. denied, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1980). It is also unlikely that any legislature, had it desired to confer immunity on th......
-
Kopf v. City of Miami Beach
...Inc., 577 So.2d 936 (Fla.1991); Lee v. Treasure Island Marina, Inc., 620 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So.2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1980); Zambito v. Southland Recreation Enters., Inc., 383 So.2d 989 (Fla. 2d ......
-
Bryant v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
...defense in premises liability cases. Hylazeski v. Wet'N Wild, Inc., 432 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So.2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1980); Bennett v. Mattison, 382 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA I would note that my reason......
-
La Villarena, Inc. v. Acosta
...was not, as a matter of law, so open and obvious as to completely relieve the defendant of liability. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So.2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1980); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts Sec. 343A cmt.f, illus. 5 (1990) (own......
-
Liability for negligently disabling or failing to repair a traffic signal: absolute immunity in the Third District?
...So. 2d 75 (Fla. 1992); Warren v. State Dep't of Transp., 559 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1990); Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So. 2d 911, 912-13 (Fla. 3d D.C.A.), review denied, 389 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 1980); Ferber v. Orange Blossom Center, Inc., 388 So. 2d 1074, 1075 (Fla. 5th ......