Metzger v. Southern Bank

Decision Date14 November 1910
Citation98 Miss. 108,54 So. 241
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesH. C. METZGER v. SOUTHERN BANK

March 1910 [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

APPEAL from the circuit court of Lauderdale county, HON. JOHN. L BUCKLEY, Judge.

Suit by the Southern Bank against H. C. Metzger, from a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The record discloses the following facts:

The Southern Bank, on account of its financial condition suspended its banking business during the month of March, 1908. At the time it closed its doors, and for some time prior thereto, one J. C. Rushing was the active cashier of said bank. On March 17, 1908, the directors of said bank held a meeting, and by resolution appointed one J. A. McCain to take charge of the accounts and bills receivable of said bank, and to collect the same. Pursuant to said appointment the said McCain took charge of said accounts and bills receivable, including the notes against Metzger sued on in this case. Mr. McCain proceeded to collect said accounts and bills receivable. After the meeting of the directors on March 17, 1908, Rushing remained in charge of the banking house and the books of the bank, received and answered all correspondence of the bank, collected some moneys due the bank, and deposited the same in the Merchants' & Farmers' Bank of Meridian, to the account of the Southern Bank, and after said meeting he continued to sign himself as cashier of the Southern Bank to checks issued in the name of the bank, and to a deed executed by the Southern Bank to certain real property, and to the contract with McCain, and was the representative of the bank who dealt with the public after March 17, 1908. Rushing received the same salary after March 17, 1908, that he did before.

Rushing testified that he knew, shortly after the meeting of Metzger's creditors, that his (Metzger's) affairs were in the hands of a committee of his creditors, and that his assets would be distributed ratably among his creditors, and that the Southern Bank would get the larger share of the assets, as it was the largest creditor. The said McCain deposited what money he collected for the bank to the account of J. A. McCain, Receiver, in the Merchants' & Farmers' Bank.

On May 6, 1908, Metzger, finding that he was unable to pay his creditors, addressed a letter to each of them, advising them of his condition, and asking them to meet him at the office of his attorneys, at which time he would bring his books, and make a full statement of his assets, and ask that the same be sold for the benefit of his creditors, as it was his desire to keep out of the bankrupt court in order to save unnecessary expense. He requested that all creditors be represented at the meeting. At that time Metzger owed the Southern Bank $ 1772 and interest, all of which was past due. One of these letters was sent by Metzger through the mail, addressed to the "Southern Bank," at Meridian, Miss. This letter was received by Rushing, who was then in charge of said banking house, and receiving and answering the mail of the Southern Bank, and it was by him turned over to McCain. McCain attended the meeting of Metzger's creditors at the time and place mentioned, as representative of the Southern Bank. About ninety per cent of the creditors of Metzger were represented at said meeting, and those creditors present appointed a committee of three, one of whom was McCain, to take charge of all the property of Metzger, and to convert the same into cash, and to distribute the proceeds ratably among his creditors. Notices to this effect were then sent to all other creditors. Thereafter the assets of Metzger were sold, and the amount received therefor applied to the payment of his debts.

Soon thereafter the said McCain, for and on behalf of the Southern Bank, signed the following release: "The undersigned, one of the creditors of H. C. Metzger, hereby accepts the above proposition of settlement, and, upon the delivery of the said assets of H. C. Metzger to the committee of creditors, does hereby release the said H. C. Metzger from all further liability to the undersigned on account of all demands to date, and does hereby authorize and empower the said committee of said creditors, composed of John Lyle, A. J. Lyon, and Joe McCain, to dispose of said assets of said H. C. Metzger for the benefit of his creditors, and to distribute the same as hereinabove proposed to the creditors of said H. C. Metzger, shown on a list (Exhibit A) to his proposition. [Signed] J. A. McCain." All of Metzger's creditors signed a release similar to the one signed by McCain for the bank.

This committee sold all of the personal property belonging to Metzger, and deposited the proceeds in the Citizens' National Bank to the credit of Jno. Lyle, Chairman. On the 7th day of November, 1908, said committee, through its chairman, issued the following check, payable to the Southern Bank, to cover its pro rata of the amount then in the hands of said committee, to wit: "No. 83, 1st dividend, 14%, H. C. Metzger, accepted. Merchants' & Farmers' Bank: Pay to the Southern Bank, or order, $ 274.95, two hundred & seventy-four dollars & 95-100 dollars. J. T. Lyle, Jr., Chairman."

It was in testimony that said check was sent through the mail addressed to the "Southern Bank." McCain testified that he did not receive said check; Rushing testified that he had no recollection of receiving it, but he testified that at the time said check was mailed he was receiving all mail addressed to the Southern Bank. Said check was deposited on the 10th day of November, 1908, in the Merchants' & Farmers' Bank, to the credit of the Southern Bank. There was no indorsement on the check. Rushing testified that the first knowledge he had of said check was some time in the month of December, 1908, when he was checking up the account of the Southern Bank with the Merchants' & Farmers' Bank. No demand was made on Metzger by any representative of the Southern Bank for the payment of the notes sued on in this case after he turned his property over to his creditors. On February 15, 1909, Metzger's mother died, leaving him an undivided one-half interest in her property. Soon after Mrs. Metzger's death the Southern Bank brought this suit. The Southern Bank, on the trial in the lower court, tendered to Metzger the amount of the above mentioned check.

Metzger filed several special pleas, in one of which he set up the release signed by McCain on behalf of the Southern Bank, alleging that McCain had authority to sign said release, and in another he set up the fact that the bank had ratified McCain's act, and in another special plea he pleaded that the bank was estopped by its conduct from contending that McCain had no authority to sign said release. Replications were filed by the Southern Bank to each of said pleas, denying the authority of McCain to bind the bank, also denying that the bank had ratified McCain's act, and denying the facts set up in the plea of estoppel. On the trial in the court below Metzger offered proof of his mother's death, and the fact that he had inherited an interest in her property shortly before the filing of this suit; but this proof was excluded.

The court gave the following instructions for the plaintiff, which are also assigned as error:

No. 15: "The court charges the jury that, though Rushing knew that the two hundred and seventy-four dollars and ninety-five cents had been credited to the account of the plaintiff, yet if his information was merely that it was a payment on the debt, and did not know of the compromise and release, such information or knowledge on the part of Rushing did not bind the plaintiff to the compromise and release."

No. 18: "The court charges the jury that J. C. Rushing, either as cashier or otherwise, had no authority to compromise the debt sued on or release the defendant from his debt, and the jury cannot find for the defendant on the idea that Rushing, as cashier, had authority to compromise said debt and to release the defendant, unless the jury believe from the evidence that plaintiff had knowledge of the compromise and acquiesced in same."

No. 19: "The court charges the jury that the authority of McCain to act for the plaintiff is measured and fixed by the minutes of the board of directors and the contract between the bank and McCain entered into in pursuance thereof, and that neither said minutes nor said contract authorized McCain to compromise the debt sued on or to release the defendant from said debt."

No. 23: "The court charges the jury that a ratification of unauthorized contract could not be made by the plaintiff, without full and complete knowledge of all the facts touching such fact, and if the jury believe from the evidence that McCain, as the agent of the plaintiff, compromised the debt sued on and released said defendant therefrom, and that said act was unauthorized, then it could not and was not ratified by any act of the plaintiff or its officers, unless at the time of such act the plaintiff had knowledge or information of the compromise and release, though the directors, Neville and Rushing, may have known that McCain attended the meeting of creditors, that a committee of creditors had the defendant's affairs in charge, and anything else that was done."

Reversed and remanded.

Neville & Stone, for appellant.

1. We contend that the cashier of a bank is the general agent of a bank.

2. That the acts of a cashier or a general agent done within the apparent scope of his authority bind the bank, unless there were special restrictions imposed upon his power which special restrictions were known to the party dealing with the cashier.

3. That notice to the cashier is imputed to the bank. We will discuss these propositions in the order...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Mississippi Utilities Co. v. Smith
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1933
    ... ... v. Bosse, 86 Tex. 344, 24 S.W. 798; Nugent v ... Powell, 62 A. S. R. 17; First Nat'l Bank v ... Ragsdale, 81 A. S. R. 332; Miles Planting Co. v ... Ware, 78 So. 104; [166 Miss ... apparent scope of his authority ... Metzger ... v. Southern Bank, 54 So. 241, 98 Miss. 108; P. W. & B. R ... R. Co. v. Brannen, 2 A. 429; ... ...
  • Aetna Ins. Co. v. Lester
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1934
    ... ... Bacot v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 96 Miss. 223, 50 So. 729; ... [170 Miss. 355] Metzger v. Southern Bank, 98 Miss. 108, 117, ... 54 So. 241 ... It is ... elementary that the ... ...
  • Anglo-American Mill Co., Inc. v. Community Mill Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1925
    ... ... 4 ... Where in a transaction with a bank its cashier is openly ... acting in the interest of another corporation of which he is ... an ... Co., 8 ... Idaho 200, 101 Am. St. 188, 67 P. 493, 56 L. R. A. 554; ... Southern California Hardwood & Mfg. Co. v. Borton, ... 46 Cal.App. 524, 189 P. 1022; Murray Co. v ... Eq. 387, 67 A. 339; State Bank of ... Morton v. Adams, 142 Minn. 63, 170 N.W. 925; Metzger ... v. Southern Bank, 98 Miss. 108, 54 So. 241; Lea v ... Iron Belt Mercantile Co., 147 Ala ... ...
  • Capital Paint & Glass Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1937
    ... ... 22 C ... J., pages 386-88, sec. 460-61, and page 367, sec. 440; ... National Bank of Metropolis v. Kennedy, 21 L.Ed ... 554; 3 Current Legal Thought, No. 8, page 702; McClave ... Denton, 140 Miss. 745, 106 So. 257; 2 C ... J., page 920, sec. 649, page 929, sec. 681; Metzger v ... Southern Bank, 98 Miss. 108, 54 So. 241 ... Watkins ... & Eager, of Jackson, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT