Meyer v. Schmidt

Decision Date14 April 1908
Citation109 S.W. 833,131 Mo. App. 53
PartiesMEYER et al. v. SCHMIDT et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cape Girardeau County; Henry C. Riley, Judge.

Action by George H. Meyer and another against A. J. Schmidt and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

R. L. Wilson, for appellants. B.F. Davis, for respondents.

BLAND, P. J.

Plaintiffs are partners and dealers in hardware, in the city of Cape Girardeau, under the firm name of Meyer & Schwab. Defendant Schmidt is a contractor and builder. Defendant Cape Girardeau County Fair & Park Association is a Missouri corporation and owner of the fair grounds in Cape Girardeau county. In June, 1905, the association contracted with Schmidt to furnish the material and erect a clubhouse on its fair grounds. Schmidt purchased the hardware, with the exception of some nails, from plaintiffs. The bill for the hardware aggregated $415.75. Schmidt paid $100 on the account, and for the balance ($315.75) plaintiffs filed a mechanic's lien upon the building and the acre of ground upon which it is situated. Defendants filed separate answers. That of Schmidt was a general denial and an offset. The association's answer was simply a general denial. By agreement or consent of all parties the cause was referred to John D. Wilson, Esq., as referee. The referee qualified, heard the evidence, and made a finding of the facts, and recommended that judgment go in favor of plaintiffs and against Schmidt for $315.75, and that plaintiffs have a lien on the real estate described in the lien and petition for $311. The defendant association moved to set aside the report of the referee. The court overruled the motion, confirmed the report, and entered judgment as recommended by the referee. The lien account was opened on July 11, 1905, and continued through the months of August and September, and to and including October 24th. On the latter date, one handle for trap door, two hooks and eyes, and five pounds of 8-penny nails are charged in the account. The next preceding date in the account when material was furnished is October 10th. On February 9, 1906, plaintiffs served written notice on the association of their intention to file a lien on the building and ground upon which it is situated, and filed their lien on the 23d day of the same month.

1. The association contends that Schmidt turned the building over to it on October 10, 1905, and it took possession on that date, settled with Schmidt, and discharged him as contractor, and that, if plaintiffs furnished Schmidt with the materials charged on October 24th, such sale cannot operate to continue the account to that date, so as to validate plaintiffs' lien. If the items charged on October 24th be excluded from the lien account, then plaintiffs did not file their declaration for a lien within four months, as required by statute, and for that reason acquired no mechanic's lien upon the building. Plaintiffs' evidence shows that W. L. Goodman was Schmidt's foreman and had charge of the erection of the building. Goodman swore that he and Phillip Goverau, another carpenter, "overhauled some of the sash in the building, put a handle on a trap-door, laid the floor in the attic to the water tank, put some hooks and eyes on the slip for them to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Wilson v. Fower
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 3 Noviembre 1941
    ... ... construed, particularly where amendments are offered to ... conform to the proof. Sec. 971, R. S. Mo. 1939; Meyer v ... Schmidt, 131 Mo.App. 53, 58; Lumber Co. v. Realty ... Co., 171 Mo.App. 614; Philip Gruner Lumber Co. v ... Hartshorn Barber R. Co., 154 ... ...
  • Wilson v. Fower et al.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 3 Noviembre 1941
    ...is to be liberally construed, particularly where amendments are offered to conform to the proof. Sec. 971, R.S. Mo. 1939; Meyer v. Schmidt, 131 Mo. App. 53, 58; Lumber Co. v. Realty Co., 171 Mo. App. 614; Philip Gruner Lumber Co. v. Hartshorn Barber R. Co., 154 S.W. 846; Meyer et al. v. Sch......
  • Philip Gruner & Bros. Lumber Co. v. Hartshorn-Barber Realty & Building Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 1 Marzo 1913
    ... ... 100; Mann v. Schroer, 50 ... Mo. 306; Wheeler v. Milling Company, 73 Mo.App. 672; ... Darlington v. Eldridge, 88 Mo.App. 525; Meyer v ... Schmidt, 131 Mo.App. 53, 109 S.W. 833.] ...          Had the ... petition been amended to make the description of the property ... ...
  • Philip Gruner & Bros. L. Co. v. Hartshorn-Barber R. & B. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 1 Marzo 1913
    ...App. 100; Mann v. Schroer, 50 Mo. 306; Wheeler v. Milling Co., 73 Mo. App. 672; Darlington v. Eldridge, 88 Mo. App. 525; Meyer v. Schmidt, 131 Mo. App. 53, 109 S. W. 833. Had the petition been amended to make the description of the property therein conform to that in the first lien statemen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT