Meyers Store Co. v. Armstrong

Citation61 S.W.2d 440
Decision Date19 June 1933
Docket NumberNo. 4-3041.,4-3041.
PartiesMEYERS STORE CO. v. ARMSTRONG.
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

W. P. Smith and G. M. Gibson, both of Walnut Ridge, for appellant.

H. L. Ponder, of Walnut Ridge, for appellee.

MEHAFFY, Justice.

On June 23, 1930, the appellee, Colorado Milling & Elevator Company, sold to the appellant, Meyers Store Company, 2,000 barrels of flour. The flour purchased was shipped to the appellant in three shipments, on October 13th, October 16th, and October 21st. They were shipped to shipper's order with bill of lading and directions to notify Meyers Store Company at Walnut Ridge, Ark., a draft for the amount of each shipment being attached and payable to Planters National Bank of Walnut Ridge, Ark., and being drawn through that bank.

The purchaser was permitted to take the bill of lading and get possession of the flour without paying the drafts.

On May 8, 1931, the Colorado Milling & Elevator Company filed its complaint in the chancery court for the eastern district of Lawrence county against Meyers Store Company for $2,121.66, the amount due on the flour together with protest fees and interest.

It was alleged in the complaint that the bank officials and the Meyers Store Company conspired to defraud the Colorado Milling & Elevator Company by surrendering the bills of lading without the drafts being paid; that on November 7, 1930, the appellant knew or had reasonable cause to believe that the bank was insolvent, and drew its check on said bank for the sum of $2,121.71, payable to the Planters National Bank, purporting to be given for the amount of the drafts covered by the shipments; that the check was stamped "Paid" November 5th, but was not actually made or stamped until November 7th. The appellant, knowing the insolvency of the bank, knew it would not be paid, and fraudulently dated the check November 1, 1930; that the appellant was at that time engaged in transferring the greater portion of its deposits to a bank in St. Louis, believing that the Planters National Bank was about to fail; that the Planters National Bank drew its draft on the Franklin-American Trust Company of St. Louis in the sum of $2,118.41. This draft was mailed direct to the appellant and received by the St. Louis Bank on November 8th, the Planters National Bank having closed its doors on November 7th. The draft was not paid, and the protest fees were $3.25. The appellant had designated the Planters National Bank as the collecting bank. The prayer of the complaint was for judgment against the Meyers Store Company for $2,121.66, with interest.

The appellant filed demurrer, which was overruled, and then filed answer in which it denied the allegations of the complaint, except as to purchasing the flour, and the amount of the indebtedness.

As a defense, appellant alleged that the Planters National Bank should be made a party, and be required to pay said money to the appellant or appellee, as a preferred claim. Thereafter it filed an amendment to its complaint, alleging the giving of its check in payment of the amount due appellee. It asked that J. W. Armstrong, receiver of the Planters National Bank, be made a party. The receiver was made a party and filed petition and bond for removal to the federal court and the cause was removed to the federal court.

In the federal court the receiver filed his answer, in which the allegations in the complaint against him were denied. The Colorado Milling & Flevator Company filed motion in the federal court to remand the cause, and the Meyers Store Company also filed motion to remand the cause to the Lawrence chancery court. The Colorado Milling & Elevator Company did not sue the receiver of the Planters National Bank, and did not ask that he be made a party, and no judgment was asked against him.

The appellant asked that he be made a party, but did not ask any judgment against him. It alleged that the money was a trust fund, and that the receiver be required to hold it as a trust fund to be paid either to the appellant or appellee, as the court might decide.

After the case was remanded, the receiver moved that the cause be dismissed as to him, and this motion was granted, and the cause as to him dismissed. This appeal is from the order dismissing the cause as to the receiver, and no other questions are presented for our determination.

Where a cause is removed from a state court to the federal court, and remanded by the latter court, the order of the federal court remanding the cause...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Meyers Store Co. v. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • June 19, 1933
    ...... Bank should be made a party, and be required to pay said. money to the appellant or appellee, as a preferred claim. Thereafter it filed an amendment to its complaint, alleging. the giving of its check in payment of the amount due. appellee. It asked that J. W. Armstrong, receiver of the. Planters' National Bank, be made a party. The receiver. was made a party and filed petition and bond for removal to. the Federal court, and the cause was removed to the Federal. court. . .          In the. Federal court the receiver filed his answer, in which the. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT