Meyers v. State, (No. 7007.)
Citation | 169 Ga. 468,151 S.E. 34 |
Decision Date | 13 November 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 7007.) |
Parties | MEYERS. v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1929.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Richmond County; A. L. Franklin, Judge.
Arthur Meyers was convicted of murder, and he brings error. Affirmed.
Pierce Bros., of Augusta, for plaintiff in error.
George Hains, Sol. Gen., of Augusta, Jno. M. Graham, of Atlanta, Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., and T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The grand jury of Richmond county returned a true bill against Arthur Meyers, charging that on April 1, 1924, he did kill and murder R. F. Gunn by shooting him in the body with a pistol. On the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty, without recommendation, and Meyers was sentenced to be hanged. His motion for new trial being overruled, the defendant excepted.
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The defendant offered no evidence, but made a statement, the substance of which will be set out later.
E. D. Devaney, a witness on behalf of the state, testified, in part, as follows: to catch those fellows for riding trains—and I stepped over to the other side of the engine too, and about the time I got there we were at Steedley's crossing, and this negro stepped up on the foot board. The train was moving. Mr. Gunn took hold of him. The engine had got nearly to Steedley's crossing at the time, and I told the engineer he had better stop and put him off—he might get hurt in getting down; and he stopped. He stopped about half way between Holley Street and Steedley's crossing. He stepped down off the engine with him and caught hold of him and started back to Steedley's crossing, walking down the track. We had started off then, but I was still watching, and I saw the negro feeling in the back of his coat, like that, fumbling for something, and I made the remark to Mr. Pender that we had better stop and go back down there†On cross-examination this witness testified:
S. A. Pender, the engineer referred to above, testified substantially to the same effect as the switchman. He further testified: "I watched them until they got to the corner and went around the chicken-coop at Mr. Joyner's store, and as I watched them Mr. Gunn was the least bit in the front of the negro and holding the negro. I did not see them stop at all. I did not see them have any altercation at allâ€
S. R. Young, a witness for the state, testified as follows:
Dr. A. W. Davis, for the state, testified: "I examined Mr. Gunn's body at his father's residence in Warrenton, Georgia. I was called by the deceased's father and Mr. T. L. Anderson, his father-in-law, to remove the bullet that was in his body. I went to his residence and had him just taken from the casket and placed on a table, and I got a steel bullet from about the level of the seventh or eighth rib on the left-hand side, about three and a half or four inches from the spinal column on the left side, about three quarters of an inch beneath the skin. I cut the bullet out and sutured the place over. I couldn't say whether that is the bullet or not; it looks like the bullet I cut out. It was a steel-jacket bullet. I don't know what caliber that isâ€
John J. Evans, for the state, testified: "I saw the plain-clothes man coming with a negro from Railroad Avenue this way [indicating], and the plain-clothes man had the negro in the lapel of his coat, coming along in this direction, and he was walking along with the negro, and had him in the lapel of the coat, and they walked up in front of this store, and then the plain-clothes man turned around this way, and the negro slightly that way, and about then the negro made a motion in his clothes and got his left hand this way [indicating]: like this was the plain-clothes man on this side, the negro was working his hand that way, and before I could yell to him he just shot†...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Noxon Rug Mills, Inc. v. Smith, s. 22575
...whether such charge is harmful to the movant or not, he can not complain. Coleman v. State, 141 Ga. 737(4), 82 S.E. 227; Meyers v. State, 169 Ga. 468, 479, 151 S.E. 34. Moreover, '[i]t has been held by this court that a party cannot complain that the court gave a certain charge to the jury,......
-
Mason v. State, 60162
...well settled that a defendant cannot invoke a charge and then complain that the court erred in giving such a charge. Meyers v. State, 169 Ga. 468, 479, 151 S.E. 34 (1929); Noxon Rug Mills, Inc. v. Smith, 220 Ga. 291, 293, 138 S.E.2d 569 (1964); Nesbit v. State, 112 Ga.App. 464, 465(2), 145 ......