Mickler v. Aaron
Decision Date | 09 July 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 85-1277,85-1277 |
Citation | 490 So.2d 1343,11 Fla. L. Weekly 1527 |
Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1527 Scott C. MICKLER, Appellant, v. Ruth AARON, Allstate Insurance Company; Alan S. Fishman; Bob Hurth; Dennis A. Vandenberg; Theodore Deckert; Law Offices of Brennan, McAliley, Hayskar, McAliley and Jefferson, P.A.,; Theodore Hainline; Hainline, Billing, Cochran and Heath, P.A.; Myrna Bricker; and Britton, Cohen, Cassel, Kaufman and Schantz, P.A., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Gilbert A. Haddad, of Haddad, Josephs & Jack, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Bette E. Quiat and Leslye Silverberg, of Hofrichter, Quiat & Zuckerman, P.A., Miami, for appellee Fishman.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham, of Jones & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees Vandenberg and Brennan, et al., P.A. and Robert M. Klein and Debra J. Snow, of Stephens, Lynn, Chernay & Klein, P.A., Miami, for appellee Deckert.
Rex Conrad and Valerie Shea of Conrad, Scherer & James, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Hainline and Hainline, et al., P.A., and Robert Hurth, Boca Raton.
William D. Ricker, Jr., of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Bricker and Britton, et al., P.A.
Appellant, the successful plaintiff in a personal injury action against appellees Aaron and her insurance company, Allstate, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his impleader complaint against the attorneys who represented Aaron in that action, and the dismissal of his petition for proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1983), for collection of the outstanding $12 million judgment he has against Aaron.
Appellant argues that he should be allowed to implead the attorneys to collect money damages for legal malpractice he claims they committed in their representation of Aaron in the personal injury action. He also argues that the trial court should allow him to use the proceedings supplementary mechanism to execute upon those potential legal malpractice claims, asserting that the claims are Aaron's choses in action, thus her assets, upon which he is allowed to execute.
Appellant's contentions are without merit based upon this court's decisions in Washington v. Firemans Fund Insurance Co., 459 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) ( ) and Puzzo v. Ray, 386 So.2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gray v. Oliver
...by a former adversary where the right was obtained by execution. See Kracht , 268 Cal. Rptr. at 639–40 ; Mickler v. Aaron , 490 So. 2d 1343, 1344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (per curiam); Chaffee , 645 P.2d at 966 ; Charles , 878 S.W.2d at 205–06 ; Snow, Nuffer, Engstrom & Drake , 980 P.2d at 211.F......
-
Tanasse v. Snow
...389, 133 Cal.Rptr. 83, 86 (1976); Roberts v. Holland & Hart, 857 P.2d 492, 495-96 (Colo.Ct.App.1993); Mickler v. Aaron, 490 So.2d 1343, 1344 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986)(per curiam); Brocato v. Prairie The minority view holds that such claims arise out of routine negligence and breach of contract......
-
Roberts v. Holland & Hart
...142 Ariz. 395, 690 P.2d 114 (App.1984); Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc., 62 Cal.App.3d 389, 133 Cal.Rptr. 83 (1976); Mickler v. Aaron, 490 So.2d 1343 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986); Brocato v. Prairie State Farmers Insurance Association, 166 Ill.App.3d 986, 117 Ill.Dec. 849, 520 N.E.2d 1200 (1988) app......
-
Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings, LLC v. Estate of Jackson
...as new defendants by filing impleader complaints. See, e.g., Rosenfeld, 630 So.2d at 1167;Warren, 522 So.2d at 980;Mickler v. Aaron, 490 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Mitutoyo Am. Corp. v. Suncoast Precision, Inc., No. 8:08–mc–36–T–TBM, 2011 WL 2802938, at *1 (M.D.Fla. July 18, 2011); Off......
-
10-2 Express Assignments
...Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 459 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1984). See also Mickler v. Aaron, 490 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1986).[3] Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 459 So. 2d 1148, 1149 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1984).[4] Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agen......