Middleton v. Baker

Decision Date02 December 1914
Docket NumberNo. 16840.,16840.
Citation262 Mo. 398,171 S.W. 328
PartiesMIDDLETON v. BAKER et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Callaway County; N. D. Thurmond, Judge.

Action by James A. Middleton against Frank T. Baker and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

This is an action brought in the circuit court of Callaway county, by the plaintiff against the defendants, to set aside a sale of real estate, sold under a deed of trust, executed to secure borrowed money. The grounds for relief, as charged, were fraud, mistake, surprise, and inadequacy of consideration paid for the land, etc. The judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, and by that court certified here under the Constitution. The record is short, the facts few, and practically no conflict in the testimony. The facts of the case are substantially as follows: On and prior to July 1, 1905, N. M. Baker, Lidia Baker, William Baker, and Nancy Baker owned 40 acres of land situate in Callaway county, Mo., particularly described in the petition. On that date they made and delivered to the plaintiff, James A. Middleton, their promissory note for the sum of $227.20, bearing 8 per cent. interest, due one day after date, and executed the deed of trust conveying said land to secure said loan. That, said note not having been paid when due, the plaintiff requested the defendant John H. Buchanan, the sheriff of said county, the substituted trustee (the one named in the deed of trust having died), to advertise and sell the land to pay said note. That in pursuance to said request, and according to the terms of said deed, the trustee advertised the land for sale at the west front door of the courthouse at Fulton, on August 1, 1910, between the hours of 9 o'clock in the forenoon and 5 o'clock in the afternoon, and on said day, at the hour of 2 o'clock p. m., he sold said land to the defendant Frank T. Baker, for the sum of $26, a stranger to all the transactions. All the Bakers save the last one mentioned were negroes; and the latter was an old friend of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • West v. Axtell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 1929
    ...same, and if he fails to do so he takes the risk of having the sale vacated. 27 Cyc. 1475; Speer v. Home Bank, 200 Mo.App. 269; Middleton v. Baker, 262 Mo. 398. The court erred in sustaining the sale, because said sale was made at an unusual hour. Stephenson v. Kilpatrick, 166 Mo. 262. The ......
  • West v. Axtell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 1929
    ...same, and if he fails to do so he takes the risk of having the sale vacated. 27 Cyc. 1475; Speer v. Home Bank, 200 Mo. App. 269; Middleton v. Baker, 262 Mo. 398. (4) The court erred in sustaining the sale, because said sale was made at an unusual hour. Stephenson v. Kilpatrick, 166 Mo. 262.......
  • Lange v. McIntosh
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 5 Enero 1937
    ...reject the bid and postpone the sale, failing in which, the sale will be set aside. Meyer v. Jefferson Ins. Co., 5 Mo.App. 245; Middleton v. Baker, 262 Mo. 398; West v. Axtell, 322 Mo. 401, 17 S.W.2d Lunsford v. Davis, 300 Mo. 532; Hardware Co. v. Brownlee, 186 Mo. 629. Chas. M. Grayston fo......
  • Cordia v. Matthes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Julio 1939
    ... ... a sale at that price should be set aside. 1 Black on ... Rescission & Cancellation, sec. 175; Middleton v ... Baker, 262 Mo. 398; Vail v. Jacobs, 62 Mo. 130; ... West v. Axtell, 322 Mo. 415; Lunsford v ... Davis, 300 Mo. 532; Lange v. McIntosh, 100 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT