Milander v. Department of Water & Sewer of City of Hialeah, 84-300

Decision Date02 October 1984
Docket NumberNo. 84-300,84-300
Citation456 So.2d 588
PartiesMyles E. MILANDER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF WATER & SEWERS OF the CITY OF HIALEAH and Leo Caraballo, Octavio Santurio, and William Whitman, individually and jointly, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Holden & Holden and Frank Holden, Hialeah, for appellant.

Stephens, Lynn, Chernay, Klein & Zuckerman and Robert M. Klein, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The appellee city advertised for bids for the sale of a parcel of realty. The appellant Milander submitted the high bid, but the city rejected them all and did not sell the property to anyone. In entering judgment on the pleadings, the trial court correctly held that, since the bids constituted no more than offers to the city, none of which, although it had requested their submission, it was under a legal obligation to accept, Meekins-Bamman Prestress, Inc. v. Better Construction, Inc., 408 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); City of Homestead v. Raney Construction, Inc., 357 So.2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Schloesser v. Dill, 383 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), Milander had acquired no enforceable rights. Compare, e.g., Adolpus v. Baskin, 95 Fla. 603, 116 So. 225 (1928) (when contract subject to competitive bidding is awarded, most favorable bid may not ordinarily be disregarded); Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 383 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and cases cited (same).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT