Milanick v. State, 5D13–4493.
Decision Date | 16 May 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 5D13–4493.,5D13–4493. |
Citation | 147 So.3d 34 |
Parties | Alexander MILANICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael J. Walker of R. Matthews Miles, Jr., P.A., Holly Hill, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Diane L. Guillemette, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Alexander Milanick appeals a non-final order denying his motion to quash and dismiss the proceeding. He argues that the case should have been dismissed based on the State's failure to personally serve him. We agree and reverse.
The instant action was brought by the State pursuant to section 112.317(7), Florida Statutes, which authorizes the State to bring a civil action to recover costs and fees awarded by the Florida Commission on Ethics. Previously, the Florida Commission on Ethics had entered an order against Milanick with which Milanick never complied.
The State attempted to personally serve Milanick but was unsuccessful; thus, it constructively served him instead. Milanick filed a notice of special appearance and motion to quash and dismiss the proceeding on the ground that he had not been personally served with process and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over him. The State responded by admitting that it failed to personally serve Milanick and filing a proof of service by publication. The trial court denied Milanick's motion, ruling that the case was a debt enforcement case and that constructive service was sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction under section 49.011(1), Florida Statutes. This timely appeal followed.
Section 49.011, Florida Statutes, provides that service by publication may be made in any action or proceeding “[t]o enforce any legal or equitable lien or claim to any title or interest in real or personal property within the jurisdiction of the court or any fund held or debt owing by any party on whom process can be served within [Florida].” § 49.011(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). The case law is clear, however, that constructive service by publication under this statute cannot confer a court with jurisdiction over a person. See Drury v. Nat'l Auto Lenders, Inc., 83 So.3d 951, 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ( ; Huguenor v. Huguenor, 420 So.2d 344, 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Markey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...on the trial court." Archer v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 220 So. 3d 477, 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017) (quoting Milanick v. State, 147 So.3d 34, 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)). Significantly, this does not mean that the court could not proceed with the foreclosure action; "personal jurisdicti......
-
Archer v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, Case No. 5D16–1970
...by publication under [section 49.011(1), Florida Statutes ] cannot confer a court with jurisdiction over a person." Milanick v. State , 147 So.3d 34, 35 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). Rather, constructive service confers only in rem jurisdiction on the trial court. See Bedford Computer Corp. v. Graph......
-
Summons, service of process, and e-mail service
...unless the respondent voluntarily appears in the action, or in some way waives objection to personal jurisdiction. [ Milanick v. State , 147 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (holding constructive service by publication under section 49.011, Fla. Stat., Florida Statutes, cannot confer a court w......