Miles v. City Council of Augusta, Ga., 82-8766
| Decision Date | 04 August 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-8766,82-8766 |
| Citation | 710 F.2d 1542 |
| Parties | Carl M. MILES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Non-Argument Calendar. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
N. Kenneth Daniel, Augusta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.
Before TJOFLAT, JOHNSON and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs Carl and Elaine Miles, owners and promoters of "Blackie the Talking Cat," brought this suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, challenging the constitutionality of the Augusta, Georgia, Business License Ordinance. Their complaint alleged that the ordinance is inapplicable in this case or is otherwise void for vagueness and overbroad, and that the ordinance violates rights of speech and association. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant City Council of Augusta. Miles v. City of Augusta, 551 F.Supp. 349 (S.D.Ga.1982). We affirm.
The partnership between Blackie and the Mileses began somewhat auspiciously in a South Carolina rooming house. According to the deposition of Carl Miles:
Well, a girl come around with a box of kittens, and she asked us did we want one. I said no, that we did not want one. As I was walking away from the box of kittens, a voice spoke to me and said, "Take the black kitten." I took the black kitten, knowing nothing else unusual or nothing else strange about the black kitten. When Blackie was about five months old, I had him on my lap playing with him, talking to him, saying I love you. The voice spoke to me saying, "The cat is trying to talk to you." To me, the voice was the voice of God.
Mr. Miles set out to fulfill his divination by developing a rigorous course of speech therapy.
I would tape the sounds the cat would make, the voice sounds he would make when he was trying to talk to me, and I would play those sounds back to him three and four hours a day, and I would let him watch my lips, and he just got to where he could do it.
Blackie's catechism soon began to pay off. According to Mr. Miles:
He was talking when he was six months old, but I could not prove it then. It was where I could understand him, but you can't understand him. It took me altogether a year and a half before I had him talking real plain where you could understand him.
Ineluctably, Blackie's talents were taken to the marketplace, and the rest is history. Blackie catapulted into public prominence when he spoke, for a fee, on radio and on television shows such as "That's Incredible." Appellants capitalized on Blackie's linguistic skills through agreements with agents in South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia. The public's affection for Blackie was the catalyst for his success, and Blackie loved his fans. As the District Judge observed in his published opinion, Blackie even purred "I love you" to him when he encountered Blackie one day on the street. 1
Sadly, Blackie's cataclysmic rise to fame crested and began to subside. The Miles family moved temporarily to Augusta, Georgia, receiving "contributions" that Augusta passersby paid to hear Blackie talk. After receiving complaints from several of Augusta's ailurophobes, the Augusta police--obviously no ailurophiles themselves 2--doggedly insisted that appellants would have to purchase a business license. Eventually, on threat of incarceration, Mr. and Mrs. Miles acceded to the demands of the police and paid $50 for a business license.
The gist of appellant's argument is that the Augusta business ordinance contains no category for speaking animals. The ordinance exhaustively lists trades, businesses and occupations subject to the tax and the amount of the tax to be paid, but it nowhere lists cats with forensic prowess. However, section 2 of Augusta's Business Ordinance No. 5006 specifies that a $50 license shall be paid by any "Agent or Agency not specifically mentioned." Appellants insist that the drafters of section 2 could not have meant to include Blackie the Talking Cat and, if they did, appellants assert that section 2, as drafted, is vague and overbroad and hence unconstitutional.
Upon review of appellants' claims, we agree with the district court's detailed analysis of the Augusta ordinance. The assertion that Blackie's speaking engagements do not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vestavia Plaza, LLC v. City of Vestavia Hills
...not allege that the business license ordinance infringes any First Amendment speech or assembly rights. See Miles v. City Council of Augusta, Ga., 710 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983). It does not seek to legislate or regulate in matters outside the general police power of a city or into constitu......
-
Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. ex rel. Happy v. Breheny
...Animal Suffering and Exploitation, Inc. v. New England Aquarium, 836 F. Supp. 45, 49 [D. Mass. 1993] ; Miles v. City Council of Augusta, Ga., 710 F.2d 1542, 1544 n. 5 [11th Cir.1983] ). As these courts have aptly observed, legal personhood is often connected with the capacity, not just to b......
-
Jones v. Fransen
...or other such entity." O.C.G.A. § 50–21–22(4). A dog does not qualify as any of these things. Cf. Miles v. City Council of Augusta , 710 F.2d 1542, 1544 n.5 (11th Cir. 1983) (declining to hear a claim that a cat's right to free speech was infringed because a cat "cannot be considered a 'per......
-
Dye v. Wargo
...well as individuals", but dogs are not on this list, whether or not they act under color of state law. Cf. Miles v. Augusta City Council, 710 F.2d 1542, 1544 n.5 (11th Cir. 1983) (a cat is not a "person" for purposes of the fourteenth amendment). A suit against a dog poses a host of other p......
-
Chapter 35 Ethical Judicial Writing
...City Council of Augusta, 551 F. Supp. 349 (S.D. Ga. 1982) (Bowen, J.) (using cat references in case about taxing cat’s earnings), aff’d, 710 F.2d 1542, 1544 (11th Cir. 1983) (per curiam).[813] . See, e.g. State v. Knowles, 739 S.W.2d 753, 754 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987) (Nugent, J.) (“Old Dave Bair......
-
Chapter 17 Judicial Jesting: Judicious?
...denied, 502 U.S. 961 (1991).[229] . Id. at 1093 (citations omitted). [230] . 551 F. Supp. 349 (S.D. Ga. 1982) (Bowen, J.).[231] . See 710 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983). The Miles opinions are so notable the West Group published a book in their honor. See Blackie the Talking Cat and Other Favor......
-
Writing Matters
...Easter Seal Soc'y for Crippled Children v. Playboy Enter., 815 F.2d 323 (5th Cir. 1987). [6] Miles v. City Council of Augusta, Georgia, 710 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983). [7] Gerald Lebovits, Judicial Jesting: Judicious?, NY. St. B.J., Sept. 2003, at 64. [8] Lisa A. Mazzie, Logos, Ethos and Pa......