Miller v. American Bank & Trust Co.
Decision Date | 01 May 1922 |
Docket Number | 10102. |
Citation | 71 Colo. 346,206 P. 796 |
Parties | MILLER v. AMERICAN BANK & TRUST CO. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, Denver County; Clarence J. Morley, Judge.
Action by Charles F. Miller against the American Bank & Trust Company. Judgment for defendant when plaintiff elected to stand by his complaint after demurrer thereto was sustained and plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
Charles F. Miller, of Denver, pro se.
Fillius Fillius & Winters, of Denver, for defendant in error.
Plaintiff Charles F. Miller, brought this suit to compel payment to him by the defendant bank of a certain deposit in its savings account department. Plaintiff having amended his complaint, defendant demurred thereto, the demurrer was sustained and the cause dismissed, on Miller's election to stand by his cause as made. Miller now brings the record here for review on error.
The savings account in question was opened in December, 1916, by Frank Sharp and Nettie B. Losee, by a deposit of $7,000.00, under the following agreement:
After a statement of account showing the deposit, credit of interest and one withdrawal, is the following:
Frank Sharp.
'Nettie B. Losee.'
Sharp died in July, 1917, and in November, 1919, Nettie B. Losee for value assigned and transferred all her interest in the account to plaintiff. The bank declined to pay over the money to him on his demand as such assignee, and he brought this suit with the above-stated result.
The complaint as amended shows the deposit with The German-American Trust Company that The American Bank & Trust Company is its successor, sets forth the agreement quoted above, the fact of Sharp's decease, full compliance with all the rules and regulations of the bank, the assignment to plaintiff, his demand for payment and the bank's refusal. Also that Nettie B....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
O'Brien v. Biegger
... ... deposited in a savings account (No. 1217) in a Humboldt bank, ... the sum of $5,000, which she had received from her ... father's ... put the same trust in her husband in her account, that he put ... in her. There is nothing ... however." ... The question ... again came up in Miller v. Williams, 195 Iowa 1305, 1307, 192 ... N.W. 798, 799, Justice Evans ... and authorities cited; Miller v. American Bank & Trust ... Co., 71 Colo. 346, 206 P. 796; First National Bank v ... ...
-
Burns v. Nolette
...National Bank v. Le Beau, 195 Mich. 502, 161 N. W. 974, L. R. A. 1917D, 852; Kelly v. Woolsey, 177 Cal. 325, 170 P. 837; Miller v. Bank, 71 Colo. 346, 206 P. 796; Chippendale v. Bank, 222 Mass. 499, 111 N. E. 371; Blick v. Cockins, 252 Pa. 56, 97 A. The cases relied upon by the plaintiff (M......
-
Menger v. Otero County State Bank
...are controlled not by the name given the relationship or estate, but by the substance of the transaction. See Miller v. American Bank & Trust Co., 71 Colo. 346, 206 P. 796; Kelly v. Beers, 194 N.Y. 49, 86 N.E. 980, 128 Am.St.Rep. 543; Holt v. Bayles, 85 Utah 364, 39 P.2d 715. It is enough t......
-
Eisenhardt v. Lowell
... ... survivorship, may obtain as to personal property. Miller ... v. American Bank & Trust Co., 71 Colo. 346, 206 P. 796 ... This is ... ...