Miller v. Gordon
| Decision Date | 12 July 1977 |
| Citation | 58 A.D.2d 1027,397 N.Y.S.2d 500 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Roberta Sue MILLER, Respondent, v. Walter E. GORDON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Monroe Co. Legal Assistance Corp., Southern Tier Legal Services, Gerald A. McIntyre, Corning, for appellant.
Wayne Feeman, Wellsville, for respondent.
Before CARDAMONE, J. P., and SIMONS, HANCOCK, DENMAN and WITMER, JJ.
The issue on this appeal is whether an indigent respondent in paternity proceedings is entitled, as a matter of constitutional right, to have Allegany County provide him with counsel at public expense. It is from an order of the Family Court of Allegany County (Serra, J.) denying such request that respondent appeals.
Pointing to the potentially serious effects which an adverse determination in those proceedings could have on him, respondent argues that the constitutional requirements of both due process and equal protection dictate the need for government-supplied counsel. While appellant's arguments are persuasive, we do not feel that they compel this court to expand the parameters of those instances in which counsel must be provided at public expense. Although it is true that an adverse determination could form the basis for potential criminal charges, divorce proceedings and disruption of family relationships, such effects are contingent possibilities, too remote and speculative to require counsel at this stage.
The requirement to provide counsel for criminal defendants derives from constitutional provisions. "The underlying principle is that when the State or Government proceeds against an individual with risk of loss of liberty or grievous forfeiture, the right to counsel and due process of law carries with it the provision of counsel if the individual charged is unable to provide it for himself." (Matter of Smiley, 36 N.Y.2d 433, 437, 369 N.Y.S.2d 87, 90, 330 N.E.2d 53, 55.) No similar constitutional or statutory provision applies to private litigation.
Paternity proceedings in this state are civil, not quasi-criminal as appellant contends. (Matter of Bido v. Albizu, 36 A.D.2d 537, 318 N.Y.S.2d 547; Matter of Harris v. Doley, 22 A.D.2d 769, 253 N.Y.S.2d 645.) The danger of incarceration would arise only if respondent failed to comply with a support order, not as a direct result of any determination in those proceedings.
The arguments raised here are essentially similar to those urged by appellants in Matter of Smiley, su...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Czajak v. Vavonese
...on Court Reorganization, No. 2 The Family Court Act, 2 McKinney's 1962 N.Y. Session Laws 3441. Cf: Matter of Miller v. Gordon, 58 A.D.2d 1027, 397 N.Y.S.2d 500 (4th Dept. 1977). The legislative history of Article 5 of the Family Court Act reveals that "the principal purpose of the proceedin......
-
In re Richard N.
...of Troy, 258 A.D.2d 849, 686 N.Y.S.2d 154, lv. to app. dismissed, 93 N.Y.2d 1000, 695 N.Y.S.2d 745, 717 N.E.2d 1082 ; Miller v. Gordon, 58 A.D.2d 1027, 397 N.Y.S.2d 500 ).The U.S. Supreme Court addressed the question, posed herein, as to “what procedural protections are due before any parti......
-
Hepfel v. Bashaw
...248 (1976). On the other hand, where the action is considered civil in nature, counsel has been denied. See, e. g., Miller v. Gordon, 58 A.D.2d 1027, 397 N.Y.S.2d 500 (1977); Ford v. Herndon, 62 Cal.App.3d 492, 133 Cal.Rptr. 111 In Minnesota it is unequivocally established that a paternity ......
-
Department of Housing Preservation and Development of City of New York v. Lamison
...applies, generally, to private or civil litigation. Madeline G. v. David R., 1978, 95 Misc.2d 273, 407 N.Y.S.2d 414. Miller v. Gordon, 1977, 58 A.D.2d 1027, 397 N.Y.S.2d 500. It is not disputed that the instant proceedings to punish for contempt are civil in nature rather than criminal. But......