Miller v. Miller, 47224
| Decision Date | 15 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 47224,47224 |
| Citation | 670 S.W.2d 591 |
| Parties | Gary L. MILLER, Respondent, v. Elizabeth L. MILLER, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Barbara J. Gilchrist, St. Louis, for appellant.
Douglas Lee Burdette, Clayton, for respondent.
Elizabeth L. Miller appeals the denial of her request for a court order to change or to restore her maiden name. The judgment is reversed and the trial court directed to issue its order changing appellant's name.
Gary L. Miller, petitioner's husband and respondent herein, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The parties then entered into a separation agreement which disposed of all issues involved in the action, including a provision stating "wife's name shall be returned to her maiden name, to wit: Elizabeth Lydia Herzog." Petitioner's husband agreed to the name change and filed no respondent's brief in this cause.
At an uncontested hearing appellant testified that neither her creditors nor her two minor children, ages eight and six, would be adversely affected by the change of name. No other evidence was introduced.
On March 28, 1983, the trial court found the separation agreement conscionable and adopted its provision in the dissolution decree with the exception of appellant's name change stating [the court] "is not convinced that it is not detrimental to your minor children to change your name back to Herzog."
We have previously addressed the exact issue presented here in the case of In the Matter of Natale, 527 S.W.2d 402 (Mo.App.1975) where a married woman with her husband's consent petitioned to have her name changed back to her maiden name. Even though the evidence indicated that the change would not have a detrimental effect on anyone, the trial court denied the request on the basis that petitioner was married, lived with her husband, and that there could be a detriment to any children born in the future or to her creditors. (Emphasis ours.)
In reversing the judgment, this court held that the discretion in denying such petitions is narrow and that the possibility of a detrimental effect was insufficient reason to deny the petition. Id. at 405. We further held that appellant has both a common law right and a statutory right pursuant to § 527.270 to change her name. Both methods are coexistant and § 527.270 neither expressly abrogates the common law nor invalidates it by any inconsistencies. Id. at 402. Accordingly, the courts in dissolution proceedings have consistently granted the restoration of maiden names under either...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marriage of Quintard, In re
...Marriage of Jadwin, 671 S.W.2d at 10 [award of rehabilitative maintenance justified in view of wife's crippling disease]; Miller v. Miller, 670 S.W.2d 591 (Mo.App.1984) [wife had diabetes; had had major surgery four times and was unable to drive. An award of maintenance was held A further q......
-
Newsom v. Newsom, WD
...raise the issue, as the common law and statutory rights to change her name belonged to Wife, and not to Husband. See Miller v. Miller, 670 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Mo.App.1984); Matter of Natale, 527 S.W.2d 402, 405-06 (Mo.App.1975). Section 527.270, RSMo 1994, and Rule 95.01 provide only for the p......
-
B-- L-- W-- by Ellen K-- v. Wollweber, 17422
...evidence, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, or unless it erroneously declares or applies the law. Miller v. Miller, 670 S.W.2d 591, 593 (Mo.App.1984). A trial court has discretion under Rules 95.03 and 95.04 2 to deny a petition if there is evidence that the change would be d......
-
R.K.-T.S. by v. T. v. R.S., WD
...best interests. Kirksey v. Abbott, 591 S.W.2d 751, 752 (Mo.App.1979); In re Wheat, 794 S.W.2d 710, 712-14 (Mo.App.1990); Miller v. Miller, 670 S.W.2d 591 (Mo.App.1984); Matter of Natale, 527 S.W.2d 402 The trial court's scope of discretion to deny a child's name change petition is narrow si......