Miller v. Nolte, 82-1435

Citation427 So.2d 248
Decision Date16 February 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1435,82-1435
PartiesNorman MILLER, Appellant, v. David C. NOLTE, as Property Appraiser of Indian River County, Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Clifford H. Miller of Miller & Miller, Vero Beach, for appellant.

Robert Jackson of Law Offices of Robert Jackson, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellee.

HURLEY, Judge.

The question presented is whether a taxpayer is foreclosed from contesting a tax assessment because of his failure to file an action within 60 days from the date the assessment was certified for collection. The Supreme Court resolved this question in Coe v. ITT Development Corp., 362 So.2d 8 (Fla.1978), where it held "that the 60-day time limitation expressed in Section 194.171(2) ... is a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim rather than a statute of limitations." Thus, a taxpayer's failure to act within the sixty-day period constitutes a complete bar and, consequently, we affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee/property appraiser.

Appellant/taxpayer, dissatisfied with the tax assessment on his home, appealed to the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board of Indian River County. After a hearing, the board denied the appeal in a written "record of decision" which contained a checked box next to the statement, "The relief in your petition was denied." 1 Pursuant to section 193.122(2), Florida Statutes (1981), the assessment was certified for collection on December 7, 1981. Eighty-four days later--on March 1, 1982--the appellant/taxpayer filed an action in the circuit court to contest the assessment. The trial court eventually entered a summary judgment in favor of the appellee/property appraiser and this appeal ensued.

Section 194.171(2), Florida Statutes (1981), states that "[n]o action shall be brought to contest a tax assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under § 193.122(2)." Given the Supreme Court's holding that this is a statute of non-claim rather than a statute of limitations, Coe v. ITT Community Development Corp., supra, we cannot accept appellant's contention that the deficiency in the board's order should estop the property appraiser from asserting the statute of limitations. To the contrary, we are compelled to hold that the taxpayer's failure to act within the 60 day period is a complete bar to the present action.

We recognize that our decision expressly and directly conflicts with Cape Cave Corp. v. Lowe, 411 So.2d 887 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Had we the freedom to choose, we might well opt for the Second District...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Miller v. Nolte
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1984
    ...in this case had been resolved by this Court in Coe v. ITT Community Development Corp., 362 So.2d 8 (Fla.1978). Miller v. Nolte, 427 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). In its brief opinion, the district court stated that Coe held that the sixty-day time limitation expressed in section 194.171(2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT