Miller v. Phillips
Decision Date | 12 March 1946 |
Citation | 25 So.2d 194,157 Fla. 175 |
Parties | MILLER v. PHILLIPS et vir. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; George E. Holt judge.
Hyzer & Padgett, of Miami, for appellant.
Frank E Bryant, of Miami, for appellee.
Evie Louise Phillips, feme covert, entered into a written contract to sell certain of her lands to Rodney Miller, but notwithstanding the agreement, she and her husband later advised the appellant that they would not perform. The husband did not execute the contract. For many years he had been blind and unable to sign papers except by affixing his mark. Upon occasion his wife had executed instruments for him. He was active in listing for sale the property now in controversy, and when the broker explained the contents of the contract to him and his wife he approved its provisions. Many years before he had given a power of attorney to his wife, and this instrument had not been revoked. These facts were alleged in the bill of complaint, which contained the prayer that the appellees specifically perform the contract. The chancellor dismissed the bill upon motion, and this appeal followed.
The primary question is the enforceability of the agreement signed only by the wife, and the secondary ones are the effect upon it of the husband's verbal approval and the outstanding power of attorney.
The statute immediately brought to mind, and stressed by the appellant is Section 708.08, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., which is the first section of Chapter 21932, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1943. This so-called emancipatory measure is decidedly interesting when the portions of it dealing with the sale and conveyance of a married woman's separate real property--the situation with which we are confronted--are studied. We quote the whole section italicizing such parts of it as seem directly to affect a transaction of this character: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dixon v. Clayton
...§ 708.08 et seq. The only relevant part of that law cited by appellant is Section 1, 708.08, supra. In our opinion in Miller v. Phillips et vir., 157 Fla. 175, 25 So.2d 194, we pointed out that the power granted a married woman in the first part of this section to sell her property without ......
-
Frazier v. Hart
...requires, as a prerequisite to the validity of an instrument such as this, that the husband execute the instrument. Miller v. Phillips, 1946, 157 Fla. 175, 25 So.2d 194. Finding no error in the judgment appealed, the same is hereby Affirmed. ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur. ...
-
Smith v. Martin, 33997.
...later provision that she could do so if her husband joined in the instrument, a subject on which we animadverted in Miller v. Phillips et vir, 157 Fla. 175, 25 So.2d 194. But a study of the act and its purpose seems to dispel the thought. The original law was enacted by the Legislative Coun......