Miller v. St. Joseph Recovery Ctr., LLC
Decision Date | 26 April 2022 |
Docket Number | 20-0755 |
Citation | 874 S.E.2d 345 |
Parties | Amie MILLER, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner, v. ST. JOSEPH RECOVERY CENTER, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company; St. Joseph's Operating Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and Siltstone Holdings, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants Below, Respondents. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Walt Auvil, Esq., Kirk Auvil, Esq., Anthony Brunicardi, Esq., The Employment Law Center, PLLC, Parkersburg, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Petitioner
Philip A. Reale, II, Esq., Law Office of Philip A. Reale, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorney for the Respondents
Petitioner Amie Miller ("Ms. Miller") appeals the September 2, 2020, trial order of the Circuit Court of Wood County granting judgment in favor of the respondent, St. Joseph Recovery Center, LLC ("SJRC"), following a bench trial and dismissing her civil action.1 In her complaint, Ms. Miller alleged that SJRC violated the terms of her Employee Agreement , the Employee Handbook, and the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act by failing to provide her severance pay and compensation for accrued paid time off upon her resignation. In its trial order, the circuit court concluded that Ms. Miller's resignation was not for a "good reason," and therefore, Ms. Miller was not entitled to a severance package. Ms. Miller appeals the trial order and other pre-trial summary judgment rulings of the circuit court including the denial of her claim for payment of accrued paid time off pursuant to the Employee Handbook. Upon consideration of the terms contained in the Employee Agreement and Employee Handbook, we find that the circuit court erred. Accordingly, we reverse the rulings of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
On January 2, 2019, Ms. Miller was hired as a nurse practitioner at SJRC in Parkersburg, West Virginia. The terms and conditions of Ms. Miller's employment were governed by an employment contract titled Employment Agreement. Some of these terms included, but were not limited to, compensation, termination, resignation, and the availability of severance pay. Specifically, the Employment Agreement provided that if Ms. Miller resigned because SJRC materially breached its contract obligations – what the agreement called a "Good Reason" – then she would receive a severance package from SJRC. The Employment Agreement stated, in pertinent part, the following:
In addition, Ms. Miller was also issued an Employee Handbook which provided that SJRC would pay her any "accrued, unused paid time off" if she gave at least two weeks of notice before resigning and if she left "in good standing." The Employee Handbook contained the following relevant provisions:
Around June 18, 2019, Ms. Miller tendered a resignation letter to SJRC's CEO, Donna Meadows, and its Director of Nursing, Tabitha Smith. In the letter, Ms. Miller stated that she had 2 Ms. Miller further indicated that her last day of work would be August 15, 2019. Although she gave nearly two months of notice, the parties later agreed that Ms. Miller's employment would extend only two weeks beyond the date on which she tendered her resignation letter, to July 3, 2019.
Following her resignation, Ms. Miller initiated a lawsuit against SJRC and two other related entities. She alleged that SJRC failed to timely pay her wages on four occasions and thereby materially breached the Employment Agreement which triggered the "Good Reason" for resignation provision and SJRC's duty to pay her a severance package. Ms. Miller also recounted Sections 3.8 and 3.15 of the Employee Handbook and claimed that under those sections she was entitled to accrued, unused time off, amounting to fifty-six hours at $55.29 per hour. Additionally, Ms. Miller asserted that SJRC's failure to pay her the severance package under the Employment Agreement and its failure to pay "accrued, unused paid time off" specified in the Employee Handbook constituted violations of the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act ("WPCA" or the "Act").
SJRC moved for summary judgment and argued that Ms. Miller did not resign for "good reason," as evidenced by her resignation letter stating that she was leaving her employment to pursue a more "exciting" employment opportunity. Therefore, SJRC argued that Ms. Miller was not entitled to the severance pay provided for in the Employment Agreement. SJRC also argued that Ms. Miller had no viable WPCA claim because her claim for fringe benefits (the accrued and unused vacation time) was governed by the Employment Agreement , not the Act.
(Footnote added).
After appearing for a pretrial conference on August 24, 2020, the parties appeared for a...
To continue reading
Request your trial