Miller v. State
| Decision Date | 09 September 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. S96A0927,S96A0927 |
| Citation | 267 Ga. 92,475 S.E.2d 610 |
| Parties | MILLER v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
D. Duston Tapley, Jr., Vidalia, for Tyrone V. Miller.
Richard A. Malone, Dist. Atty., Swainsboro, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Beth Attaway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, for the State.
A Toombs County jury found Tyrone V. Miller guilty of malice murder for the fatal shooting of Cornelius Johnson, and he was sentenced to life in prison 1. We affirm.
The evidence viewed in favor of the verdict established that on the evening of February 11, 1995, Miller and several of his friends went to a nightclub in Vidalia. Miller's friend, Blair, and the victim, Johnson, began to fight. As Blair and Johnson were struggling on the floor, Miller walked over to the men, drew a handgun from his trousers, and fired four shots at Johnson, fatally wounding him. Two days after the murder, Miller gave police a videotaped statement in which he admitted shooting the victim, that he had done so without a reason, and that the murder weapon was in a dresser drawer at his mother's house. The weapon was recovered during a subsequent search of the home.
1. The evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find Miller guilty of the malice murder of Johnson beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. Miller's sole challenge is that statements made by the district attorney in closing argument improperly characterized facts not in evidence and the role of the jury, violated the right of confrontation, and were prejudicial and improper so as to constitute reversible error. 2 However, the record shows that Miller failed to object to the comments during or after closing argument. Thus, he is precluded from review of the remarks on appeal. A defendant must object to the alleged impropriety at the time it occurs in order to afford the trial court the opportunity to take remedial action. Isaac v. State, 263 Ga. 872, 874(4)(a), 440 S.E.2d 175 (1994).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
1 The killing occurred on February 11, 1995. Miller was indicted for malice murder in connection with the crime on June 13, 1995. He was tried on August 28-30, 1995. The jury found Miller guilty of malice murder on August 30, 1995, and on that day he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Miller filed a motion for new trial on September 28, 1995, and the motion was denied on ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williams v. Harvey
...of the opportunity to take appropriate remedial action and waives appellate review of any alleged impropriety."); Miller v. State , 267 Ga. 92, 92 (2), 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996) (addressing the defendant's failure to object to alleged improper closing argument at the time it occurred in order t......
-
Whatley v. State
...phase, I conclude that he has waived his right to assert error on appeal as to that phase of the trial. See Miller v. State, 267 Ga. 92(2), 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996) (failure to timely object to improper closing argument precludes review of the argument on appeal). But, with regard to possible ......
-
Brannan v. State
...this issue is waived on appeal with regard to guilt. See Gissendaner v. State, supra at 713(10)(b), 532 S.E.2d 677; Miller v. State, 267 Ga. 92(2), 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996). Moreover, it is not improper for a prosecutor to take issue with the findings and conclusions of defense experts during ......
-
Gissendaner v. State
...statements, Gissendaner's contention is waived insofar as it concerns the jury's determination of her guilt. Miller v. State, 267 Ga. 92(2), 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996); see Whatley v. State, 270 Ga. 296, 304-305, 509 S.E.2d 45 (1998) (Thompson, J., concurring specially). However, when the death ......
-
Death Penalty Law - Michael Mears
...221. Id. 222. 275 Ga. at 82, 561 S.E.2d at 426. 223. Id. (citing Gissendaner v. State, 272 Ga. 704, 532 S.E.2d 677 (2000); Miller v. State, 267 Ga. 92, 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996)). 224. Id. 225. Id. at 83, 561 S.E.2d at 427. 226. Id. 227. Id. at 82, 561 S.E.2d at 426-27. 228. Id. at 82-83, 561 S......
-
The Objection Exception Is Overruled! the Georgia Supreme Court Makes a Course Correction by Reviving the Contemporaneous Objection Rule
...at 484. See generally Sharpe v. Ga. Dept. of Transp., 267 Ga. 267, 476 S.E.2d 722 (1996); Weldon, 297 Ga. at 541, 775 S.E.2d at 525.40. 267 Ga. 92, 475 S.E.2d 610 (1996).41. Id. at 92, 475 S.E.2d at 611.42. Id. 43. Williams, 311 Ga. at 442, 858 S.E.2d at 484. See also Susan E. Loggans, Liti......