Millhiser v. Erdmann
Decision Date | 07 May 1889 |
Citation | 9 S.E. 582,103 N.C. 27 |
Parties | MILLHISER v. ERDMANN et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from superior court, Craven county; GRAVES, Judge.
A dealer in tobacco, in reply to a written request for samples expressed the samples, and sent a letter in which the terms were stated to be "3, 4, and 5 months' notes." An order was given, which was filled, the shipment being made by express, and blank notes, drawn as above, forwarded by mail, with a request to "return signed in settlement at earliest convenience." The vendee proposed payment by time drafts, which the dealer declined, longer time, however being offered on the notes. Held, that the dealer was not bound by a clause at the head of a bill rendered to the vendee, to the effect that all sales not settled in 10 days should be subject to draft, especially as the vendee, in agreeing to sign the drafts, did not in any way signify his assent to the terms at the head of the bill, and that the contract of sale was not complete until the notes were delivered.
This was an action of claim and delivery, tried before GRAVES, J at the February term, 1888, of Craven superior court. The plaintiff testified that during the year 1885 and since he was doing business in Richmond, Va., as dealer in leaf tobacco for the manufacture of cigars, and that during said time the defendant Erdmann was doing business in New Berne, N. C.; that on or about the 28th of November 1885, the plaintiff received from said defendant a postal-card as follows:
To which plaintiff replied as follows:
Not hearing from Erdmann in the mean time, the plaintiff, on December 13, 1885, sent to him a letter as follows:
That Erdmann received the samples in due course, and also the letters above set out; and on December 27, 1885, the plaintiff received a letter from Erdmann as follows:
That on December 28, 1885, the plaintiff mailed to Erdmann the following letter, which contained the invoice and the three promissory notes therein mentioned, all of which were received:
On the same day the plaintiff shipped by steam-boat the tobacco as set forth in the letter, and it was admitted that the same was duly received by Erdmann, and that the value thereof was as stated in the complaint, to-wit, $400. The defendant Erdmann did not execute and send to plaintiff his notes; and on January 16, 1886, plaintiff received from said defendant a postal-card as follows:
On the same day the plaintiff replied:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial