Mills v. Owsley Cnty. Ky.
Decision Date | 02 September 2020 |
Docket Number | No. 6:18-CV-88-REW-HAI,6:18-CV-88-REW-HAI |
Parties | Donna MILLS, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Harris, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OWSLEY COUNTY KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Kentucky |
Benjamin T.D. Pugh, Christopher D. Roach, Pugh & Roach, Attorneys at Law, Michael J. O'Hara, O'Hara, Taylor, Sloan & Cassidy, Covington, KY, for Plaintiffs.
Jeffrey C. Mando, Adams, Stepner, Woltermann & Dusing, PLLC, Covington, KY, for Defendants.
The Court confronts Defendants’ summary judgment motion as to all counts (DE #64), Plaintiffs’ partial dispositive motion as to Counts IV and V (DE #69), and Defendants’ motion to exclude certain expert testimony (DE #62). For the reasons that follow, the Court denies, largely, the motion to exclude. The Court denies in part and grants in part the cross-motions for summary judgment.
The Owsley County Sheriff and his directly supervised deputy created a needlessly violent confrontation on March 22, 2017. A jury must decide several contested aspects of the case and the claims presented. However, the Constitution extends to Booneville. Sheriff Shouse and Deputy Havicus, in several concerning respects, showed little regard for the limits on police power enshrined in the Bill of Rights. The avoidable interaction between them and the Harris family, at Charles Harris's home, cost Harris his life and surely marked forever the lives of his minor children. The Court finds a dispositive ruling proper on parts of the case, but the core must go before a federal jury.
Several discordant voices tell the chaotic tale of Charles Harris's last night and final moments. Though the parties agree on the general factual progression of the night in question, key details are in dispute. The relevant events began on the evening of March 22, 2017 when, per the testimony of Harris's former girlfriend, Janice Alexander, Harris became verbally and physically aggressive with her in Alexander's apartment.1 DE #66 (Alexander Dep.) at 9–10.2 She testified that it was the second time in a matter of weeks that Harris had become violent toward her. Id. at 9. Alexander had been caring for her infant grandson (the son of her daughter, Tisha McIntosh) at the time of the March 22 incident. Id. Immediately following the altercation, Alexander left her apartment and went to the nearby apartment of her daughter, McIntosh; on the way, Alexander phoned Harris's sister, Vickie Hacker—the manager of Alexander's and Harris's apartment complex—to warn Hacker that Harris was, per Alexander, "at it again." Id. at 10, 14; DE #71 (Hacker Dep.) at 54.3 The phone call woke Hacker, who had been in bed sleeping, sick. DE #71 at 53–54. Per Hacker, Alexander threatened to call police on Harris, and Hacker advised her to "[g]o ahead and call [the law]." Id. at 63.
By the time Alexander reached McIntosh's home, McIntosh understood that some altercation had occurred between her mother and Harris.4 DE #66 at 10. Motivated in part by concern surrounding her son's presence during the altercation, McIntosh resolved to call police and phoned Owsley Deputy Havicus. DE #68 (McIntosh Dep.) at 5. After McIntosh called, Havicus came to McIntosh's residence to talk with Alexander. DE #66 at 10; DE #68 at 6. Alexander summarized the night's events for Havicus, told him she would like to pursue a restraining order against Harris, and warned him that Harris might be dangerous. DE #66 at 10 ( ); DE #68 at 6 ( ); DE #59 (Havicus Dep.) at 169 (); id. at 187 ( ). During his interaction with Alexander, Havicus observed no visible injuries on her person. DE #59 at 169. The physical interaction involved a thrown remote and Harris shoving Alexander onto the couch.
Immediately after leaving McIntosh's residence, Havicus called Owsley Sheriff Shouse for assistance. Id. ; DE #60 (Shouse Dep.) at 130 () ; id. (). Havicus then picked up Shouse at Shouse's residence, and the pair proceeded to the Booneville apartments. DE #59 at 184–85. They first visited Alexander's apartment and, upon determining that Harris was no longer there, decided to approach Harris's apartment to question him. Id. at 187. At Harris's, the officers could hear sounds inside that indicated people were present in the apartment, but no one answered the door when Havicus knocked and announced that it was the Sheriff's Office outside. Id. at 192. Per Harris's daughter, Alexis, this took place at approximately 11:03 p.m. DE #65 (Alexis Dep.) at 195 ( ). Unable to convince Harris to answer the door, Havicus called Hacker for assistance. DE #71 at 65. Havicus and Shouse were already back at Harris's door when Hacker arrived at the apartment. Id. at 67–68. Hacker simply understood that the officers wanted to "talk to [Harris] and ask him a few questions," but did not fully understand the reason for their visit. Id. at 68.
Hacker also attempted to knock on the door and persuade Harris to answer it. DE #65 at 19 " ). Harris eventually opened the door "a few inches" to talk to Hacker. DE #71 at 76–77. Hacker said: Id. at 77. Per Hacker and Alexis, Harris responded by refusing to come outside and also refusing the officers entry to his apartment. Id. ) ; DE #65 at 19 ) .6 Hacker followed the officers into the apartment. Id.
With everyone inside the apartment, Harris was insisting that he had done nothing wrong and ordering the officers to leave. Id. Per Hacker, Defendants had their weapons drawn upon entering the unit. DE #71 at 82–83. Harris began to back away and went down the hall toward the bedroom, eventually entering the room and closing the door. Id. at 88. Hacker testified that Havicus was, at the time, threatening to shoot Harris. Id. The events unfolded quickly once Harris reached the bedroom. Havicus followed, kicked in the door, and—he says—was greeted by a knife-wielding and uncooperative Harris. DE #59 at 207–210 ) . Havicus testified that Harris, knife in hand, "back[ed] [the officers] all the way up into the living room." Id. at 208.
In the living room, per Havicus, the group had no room left to retreat, and Havicus was backed against the front door of the apartment. Id. He recalls multiple people telling Harris to drop the knife and cooperate. Id. In the moments that followed, Havicus says that he perceived Harris lunging toward him with the knife: "[Harrris] said, I'm not afraid to die, and that's when he ... kind of lunged toward me with that [knife], and that's when I fired one round hitting him in the torso area." Id. at 210; see id. ( ). Per Hacker, Shouse, who had veered into the kitchen of the apartment, was directing Havicus to shoot. DE #71 at 102 ().
The parties sharply disagree on whether Harris was in fact holding a knife during these events. Alexis agrees with Havicus that Harris was holding a knife in his hand after leaving the bedroom. DE #65 at 20 () ; id. ( ); id. at 24 ( ); id. at 24–25 ( ).7 Shouse too remembers a knife. DE #60 at 208 (); id. at 216 (); id. at 218 ( )....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ballard v. Cope
...that Cope continued to point his firearm at Ballard, even after any threat posed by the pellet gun was removed. (Id. ¶ 36). In Mills v. Owsley County Kentucky, a court in District held that a claim for excessive force could proceed where the plaintiffs were neither suspected of a crime nor ......
-
Downing v. Petry
... ... concerning the identity of the proper party.” ... Bradford v. Bracken Cnty ., 767 F.Supp.2d 740, 748 ... (E.D. Ky. 2011) (citing Black-Hosang v. Ohio Dep't of ... have been exacerbated by prior officer conduct.” ... Mills v. Owsley Cnty ., Ky., 483 F.Supp.3d 435, 460 ... (E.D. Ky. 2020). While there is a ... ...
-
Williams v. Kenton Cnty., Ky.
... ... faith and was thus not entitled to qualified official ... immunity under Kentucky law); Mills v. Owsley County ... Ky. , 483 F.Supp.3d 435, 476-77 (E.D Ky. 2020) (finding ... that allegations that a defendant used excessive and ... ...
-
Cornelius v. City of Mount Washington
... ... support an inconsistent negligence theory." Mills v ... Owsley Cty., 483 F.Supp.3d 435, 479 (E.D. Ky. 2020) ... "When an officer uses ... ...