Mills v. Parker
Decision Date | 21 June 1989 |
Parties | Allen A. MILLS and Mildred Louise Mills v. Cindy PARKER and Steven A. Mills Civ. 6898. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.
On rehearing the opinion of this court of May 10, 1989 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
Cindy Parker and Steven Mills were divorced in October 1977. Mrs. Parker was awarded custody of the parties' infant son. Mr. Mills was ordered to pay child support and was given unlimited rights of visitation.
In August 1988 Mr. and Mrs. Allen Mills, the paternal grandparents, petitioned the court, pursuant to section 30-3-4, Code 1975, seeking visitation privileges with their grandchild based upon the following
The trial court summarily dismissed the petition and found the following:
The grandparents appeal.
The grandparents acknowledge that the grant of visitation rights under section 30-3-4 is purely discretionary with the trial court and is not an absolute right. They contend, however, that the statute gives them the right to request the trial court to grant them the privilege of visitation with their grandchild and the right to be heard on such request. They argue that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition without giving them an opportunity to be heard.
The mother, expounding on the trial court's order, contends that section 30-3-4 does not allow the grandparents to file an independent action in order to obtain visitation rights. She asserts that the statutory right is available only when it is pursued in connection with the initial divorce proceeding or in subsequent child custody modification proceedings.
The pivotal question, therefore, is whether section 30-3-4 authorizes the grandparents to file an independent petition for visitation when there is no modification litigation pending between the original parties to the divorce.
Alabama is a common-law state and under common-law principles grandparents have never held a legal right to visitation with their grandchildren. Ex parte Bronstein, 434 So.2d 780 (Ala.1983). The rights that grandparents have to visitation with their grandchildren have been derived from legislative grant. We find the evolvement of the statutory grandparental rights to visitation to be pertinent to the resolution of this issue.
In 1980 the Alabama legislature enacted section 30-3-3, Code 1975, which provided the following:
"The presiding judge in a divorce case involving custody of children, may award, at his discretion, visitation rights to the grandparents of such children."
The supreme court, in Ex parte Bronstein, supra, interpreted section 30-3-3 in the following manner:
"As we construe this statute, grandparents are not given a legal right of visitation, but only a right to request that the court, at the time the divorce case is pending, to grant them the privilege of visitation."
Section 30-3-3 was repealed in 1983 by the enactment of section 30-3-4. The purpose of enacting section 30-3-4 was "[t]o provide further for visitation rights of grandparents of minor children in certain cases of divorce or death." Section 30-3-4, the statute in issue and the basis of the grandparents' petition, provides the following:
In reviewing the language of section 30-3-4, it is evident that the legislative intent in enacting section 30-3-4 was twofold. First, it expanded grandparental rights to visitation to include the situation involving the death of one of the grandchild's parents. Second, the restrictive phrase in the previous statute which limited the grandparents intervention to the "time the divorce case is pending" was replaced by the more encompassing phrase which provides that grandparents "shall" be awarded visitation rights "in divorce...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
JS v. DW
..."grandparental rights to visitation to include the situation involving the death of one of the grandchild's parents." Mills v. Parker, 549 So.2d 97, 98 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). In a case pending before the repeal of § 30-3-3, the supreme court decided Ex parte Bronstein, 434 So.2d 780 (Ala.1983)......
-
Dodd v. Burleson
...`grandparental rights to visitation to include the situation involving the death of one of the grandchild's parents.' Mills v. Parker, 549 So.2d 97, 98 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). "In 1989, the Alabama legislature amended § 30-3-4, Ala.Code 1975, to give grandparents the right to intervene in any d......
-
B.R.O. v. G.C.O.
...establish grandparental visitation rights. Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3-4(a). See Ex parte Bronstein, 434 So.2d 780 (Ala.1983); Mills v. Parker, 549 So.2d 97 (Ala.Civ.App.1989); Self v. Fugard, 518 So.2d 727 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); Cockrell v. Sittason, 500 So.2d 1119 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). The 1983 Act,......
-
Richburg v. Richburg
..."grandparental rights to visitation to include the situation involving the death of one of the grandchild's parents." Mills v. Parker, 549 So.2d 97, 98 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). In 1999, the legislature repealed § 30-3-4 and adopted § 30-3-4.1, expanding grandparent visitation in any one of sever......