Mills v. State, s. 94-3554

Decision Date02 April 1997
Docket NumberNos. 94-3554,95-1741,s. 94-3554
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly D845 Thomas MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Aubin Wade Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse Appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing under a corrected scoresheet.

It was error to score 21 points for being under legal constraint as there is no testimony or written evidence before the court that Appellant was under any type of constraint at the time of the offense. Brown v. State, 632 So.2d 1052, 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Schott v. State, 641 So.2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Blanton v. State, 546 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

It was also error to score points for two juvenile felony commitments that show on their face that Appellant was not represented by counsel. As to one, there was no attorney and no evidence of a waiver. As to the other, there also was no attorney and a purported waiver was deficient. The document was not a certified copy, and when Appellant objected, the state could not demonstrate that the signature was Appellant's. See § 39.061, Fla.Stat. (1995); Dickerson v. State, 586 So.2d 477, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Cooper v. State, 538 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Mills v. State, 97-3617.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 30, 1998
    ...Appellant was before the trial court for re-sentencing following a successful appeal of his initial 25-year sentence in Mills v. State, 690 So.2d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We found reversible error in the original sentence for impermissibly scored points for being under legal constraint and ......
  • Polanco v. State, 96-3005
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 1, 1998
    ...evidence before the trial court, that defendant was under legal constraint when he committed this offense. See Mills v. State, 690 So.2d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Schott v. State, 641 So.2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Brown v. State, 632 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Without that evidence, th......
  • Bootsma v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 95-2630
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 1997

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT