Mills v. State
| Decision Date | 08 July 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. SC01-1862.,SC01-1862. |
| Citation | 880 So.2d 616 |
| Parties | Mark D. MILLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Robert R. Wheeler, Bureau Chief, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
We have for review Mills v. State, 791 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Harvey v. State, 848 So.2d 1060 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Harvey and Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452 (Fla.2003).
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Wall Systems v. Madison Intern.
...been based on our Jollie jurisdiction. The district court expressly cited a decision under review in this Court. See, e.g., Mills v. State, 880 So.2d 616 (Fla.2004); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Levine, 837 So.2d 363 (Fla.2002); Bornemann v. Ure, 826 So.2d 255 BELL, J., dissenting. I disse......
- Byrd v. State, SC03-284.