Millsaps v. Shotwell

Decision Date03 April 1899
Citation25 So. 359,76 Miss. 923
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesREUBEN W. MILLSAPS ET AL. v. REUBEN SHOTWELL ET AL

March 1899

FROM the chancery court, second district, Coahoma county, HON. A H. LONGINO, Chancellor.

Reuben Shotwell and Mary C. Shotwell, appellees, were the complainants in the court below; Millsaps and others appellants, were defendants there.

One Robert Shotwell was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the land in controversy, and Bourbon Shotwell Sr., his son, was the owner of the other half interest. Robert Shotwell had two other sons, Reuben and Andrew L Shotwell. Robert died, leaving a will, which was duly probated and recorded, and of which the following clauses are material on the questions involved:

"Article 4. I have, by article 3, as above, of this will, given the one-half of my estate to my son, Bourbon Shotwell. I will hereby that the other half of my estate shall be given to my son, Reuben Shotwell, whom I had by my second marriage with Annie Hay, should my said son, Reuben, appear to claim it, or his children, if he shall have any, should he not be in life. My said son, up to this date, since the conclusion of the late war, has not appeared, and his fate is uncertain. Should he be in life to inherit under this will according to its provisions, I will that he shall only have the right to enjoy and possess the income of the property hereby given to him, and that at his death it shall descend to, and be inherited by, his children equally.

"This property given my said son, Reuben, shall be held by my sons, Bourbon and Andrew L. Shotwell, as trustees, to whom, as such, I hereby convey the legal title, to be held by them, and the income of said property to be paid to my said son, Reuben, as it may be necessary and proper for the maintenance of himself and family, should he have one, and for no other purpose whatever.

"I make this provision and arrangement in his behalf on account of his dissipated habits and unfitness to have the care of property.

"Article 5. Should my son, Reuben Shotwell, aforementioned, not be in life, or have children to inherit after him, I then will and direct that my said son, Bourbon, have the whole of my estate, both real and personal, and be my universal legatee.

"Article 6. In the management of that part of my estate that may be set apart under the above and foregoing will to my said son, Reuben Shotwell, I will and direct that my said sons have the power and right to manage said property as if it was their own; to sell and buy and invest any of the funds that they may thus hold as trustee, in any way they may think proper and for the interest of said son or his children, should he have any.

"I will, however, that should my said son become or be a temperate and prudent man uniformly for five years, thus showing himself to be trustworthy, it is my will he then have his property delivered to him unconditionally, to hold in his own proper right."

The agreement between Bourbon and Reuben Shotwell, referred to by the court, is and was as follows, viz:

"QUITMAN COUNTY, Miss. Feb. 1, 1878.

"WHEREAS, the late Robert Shotwell, at his death on the twenty-second February, 1872, by his last will and testament willed and devised his property to Bourbon Shotwell absolutely and to Reuben Shotwell upon certain conditions fully set forth and stated in said will, share and share alike; now, therefore,

"Be it known: That, with the view of avoiding trouble, expense and litigation, Bourbon Shotwell, as party of the first part, and Reuben Shotwell, as party of the second part, have, this the first day of February, 1878, made and entered into the following agreement, to wit:

"1. When Reuben Shotwell's part of the property shall be set aside to him in his own right, by the proper authority, so that said property shall vest absolutely in him, then the party of the first part hereby obligates and binds himself to execute to the said party of the second part a deed of release and quitclaim to his three-fourths interest in and to the land on the eastern side of Cassady Bayou, beginning at a point where the land reaches the Bayou on the east below the present ginhouse and sawmill, and following said bayou at low-water mark up to a point a little above and opposite to the mound on the west bank of the bayou, and then following the meanderings of said bayou as it runs through Cypress Brake till it crosses the center line of section 19, T. 26, R. 2 west, all of the above land being as is supposed in sections 30, 20 and 19, T. 26, R. 2 west, the number of acres not being accurately known. And the said first party is also to execute a like deed to the second party to what is known as the paw-paw orchard, beginning at a point near the Nickle ginhouse at the center of the northern line of section 19, and running west till it reaches the bank of Cassady bayou, supposed to be about 600 yards, and running down the meanderings of said bayou to a point at which a line running down south from the center of the north line of section 19 will intersect said bayou, and then due north back to the center of the north line of section 19, near the Nickle ginhouse, which last line is supposed to be about 350 yards.

"2. Upon the execution of this deed of release and quitclaim by the party of the first part, to three-fourths interest in the above land, the said party of the second part is to execute a like deed of release and quitclaim to his one-fourth interest in all the property devised by the above named last will and testament of Robert Shotwell, excepting only the property above described, and supposed to be in sections 19, 30 and 20, to which the first party is to give up his interest to the said second party.

"3. Upon the execution of these mutual deeds, each one of the above named parties is to give to the other a receipt in full for all matters and transactions which have transpired up to the date of this instrument of writing.

"4. Of the property to which the first party is to execute his release to the second party, as herein described, the second party is to take charge of this present year, and to manage and have worked for his support and profit, to the best of his ability, and the first party is likewise to take charge of the balance of the property, and manage and have worked to the best of his ability.

"BOURBON SHOTWELL. [SEAL.]

"REUBEN SHOTWELL. [SEAL.]"

The letter and extracts from letters, to which the court make reference, are as follows:

Letter from Reuben to Bourbon Shotwell:

"DUBLIN MISS., May 2, 1878.

"BRO. BOURB: The deed you gave me is dated February 1, and was written April 8, and now can't be recorded to be valid; besides, you had no right to execute the deed--your children are concerned and some of them are minors, and the other trustee knows nothing about the matter. Your object seems to be to temporize and do nothing that would be binding on you.

"I now ask you to have the matter properly arranged, so there will be no doubts about it.

"You say the deed was a gift from you to me. As such I don't want it, but I want my rights only, under the will, and I have done all I can to get you to have things fixed, to no purpose, and I will now wait ten days to hear from you. In the meantime I shall have to object to you, or any agent of yours, handling the property until the thing is properly arranged.

"I don't wish to have any trouble in the case, but I can stand no longer to be used by you.

"You know you have not acted right with the property, and seemed to be ashamed of the last accounts you brought made out by Sturges. Yours, etc.,

"R. SHOTWELL."

Extracts from letters from Bourbon Shotwell to his son Walter, as follows: Of date May 25, 1878. "Our policy must be to hold all we have and get all we can, and in all your transactions you must have a view to this thing. It distresses me for you to write as you do about going away. I cannot get along without your help, and by attention to business, and economy, we can have in a few years a fine income."

Not dated: "This week I shall draw up a deed conveying to you all the property, both real and personal, in Coahoma and Quitman counties, in which your uncle Hammy will have to join. I think that this sale to you by him and by me is necessary to entirely divest the interest of Reuben's children--then, however, the title will be perfect."

Of date Dec. 28, 1879: "Of the reasons which induce me to make this sale to you I will say nothing, so that, after this, if any questions of fraud should arise, you can state on your oath that you knew of no fraud in the matter, but that I proposed to sell to you and you bought.

"As to the payment, if you can make no other arrangement it can be arranged with your mother, as she holds a judgment against me, and, besides, I owe her for the rent of this place."

Before suit began, Reuben Shotwell conveyed an undivided one-half of his interest in the lands to his co-complainant, Mary C. Shotwell. The suit was one for determination of the complainants' right in and to the lands, and for partition between the parties according as their respective rights should be adjudged under the facts.

Before this suit was begun, Bourbon Shotwell, Sr., the son of the testator, Robert Shotwell, died, and his heirs, by deed, partitioned the lands among themselves. One of them, Bourbon Shotwell, Jr., conveyed to appellee, Millsaps, by deed of trust, etc., as shown in the opinion, the lands allotted to him in this voluntary partition.

Other facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The defendants in the court below appealed from the decision of that court to the supreme court.

Reversed and remanded.

Brame & Brame and Alexander & Alexander, for appellant.

We lay...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Adams v. Williams
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 6 Junio 1910
    ... ... Miss. 671; Murphy v. Jackson, 69 Miss. 403; ... Stockner v. Wilczinski, 71 Miss. 340; Hart v ... Livermore Co., 72 Miss. 809; Millsaps v. Shotwell, 76 ... Miss. 923 ... It must ... furthermore be borne in mind that appellee was, at the time ... of the occurrence of the ... ...
  • Lesche v. Cutrer
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 25 Febrero 1924
    ...of this will. We hardly think even the appellant's counsel will have the effrontery to ask this court to reverse the decision in Millsaps v. Shotwell. As we shall hereinafter show the the judgment of the court below upon which it was based is not only res adjudicata, but has become the law ......
  • Coman v. Jourdan
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 17 Mayo 1937
    ... ... showing of ownership as is the case here ... Mallory ... v. Walton, 119 Miss. 396, 81 So. 113; Millsaps v ... Shotwell, 76 Miss. 923, 25 So. 359; Shorter v. Lesser, ... 98 Miss. 706, 54 So. 155 ... There ... is manifest error, both of law ... ...
  • Davenport v. Collins
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 22 Marzo 1909
    ... ... of title he got by reason of the probate and record of Mr ... Burch's will and could take only such title as passed ... thereunder. Millsaps v. Shotwell, 76 Miss. 923, 25 ... Upon ... the whole case we confidently urge-- ... First ... That the homestead was subject ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT