Milly v. Smith
Decision Date | 31 May 1828 |
Citation | 2 Mo. 36 |
Parties | MILLY (A WOMAN OF COLOR) v. SMITH. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
APPEAL FROM ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT COURT.
This was an action of trespass, &c., under the statute brought by Milly the appellant, against Smith the appellee, to establish a right to freedom. The appellee pleaded the general issue. Judgment was entered for the appellee, from which the appellant appeals to this court. The facts proved at this trial are, that David Shipman, a resident of Kentucky, owned and was in possession of the appellant as a slave; that on the 17th October, 1826, while residing in Kentucky, he executed a deed to said Smith of which a copy is here given, viz: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Crow
...in the petition authorizing its introduction. The statutes of a sister state are facts and must be proved like any other fact. Milly v. Smith, 2 Mo. 36: Babcock v. Babcock, 46 Mo. 243; Morris v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 47 Mo. 521; 25 Mo. 465. (6) The petition must contain all the facts necessary......
-
Flato v. Mulhall
...v. Ball, 19 Mo. 84; Franklin v. Twogood, 25 Ia. 520; Bliss Plead., §§ 180, 183; Morrissey v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 47 Mo. 525; Milly v. Smith, 2 Mo. 36. 4. There is no presumption that the common law prevails in Texas. Throop v. Hatch, 3 Abb. Pr. 23; Chouteau v. Pierre, 9 Mo. 3; Ott v. Soulard......
-
Carson v. Hunter
...law of Missouri, the consideration for the note is good, and this court will presume the laws of Arkansas to be the same as ours. (Milly v. Smith, 2 Mo. 36; Charlotte v. Chouteau, 25 Mo. 465.) BLISS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff brought his action upon a promisso......
- Stokes v. O'Fallon