Milne v. Milne Const. Co., S54160.
| Decision Date | 19 December 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. S54160.,S54160. |
| Citation | 342 Or. 253,149 P.3d 1212 |
| Parties | Milne v. Milne Const. Co. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petitions for review Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 cases
-
DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hosp. at Stanford, Civ. 10–6131–AA.
...the term “DMAP rates” is unambiguous and can only be reasonably interpreted to refer to plaintiff's DMAP rates. Milne v. Milne Constr. Co., 207 Or.App. 382, 388, 142 P.3d 475,rev. den.,342 Or. 253, 149 P.3d 1212 (2006). The interpretation of the phrase proffered by defendant is unreasonable......
-
DCIPA, LLC v. Packard
...the term "DMAP rates" is unambiguous and can only be reasonably interpreted to refer to plaintiff's DMAP rates. Milne v. Milne Constr. Co., 207 Or. App. 382, 388, 142 P.3d 475, rev. den., 342 Or. 253, 149 P.3d 1212 (2006). The interpretation of the phrase proffered by defendant is unreasona......
-
Adair Homes, Inc. v. Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue, LLP
...A party is entitled to summary judgment only if the terms of the contract are unambiguous on their face. Milne v. Milne Construction Co., 207 Or.App. 382, 388, 142 P.3d 475,rev. den.,342 Or. 253, 149 P.3d 1212 (2006). We review for legal error a ruling that a contract is unambiguous. Yogman......
-
State v. Lobue
...to the jury, or to the court sitting as factfinder, as it did in this case and as it does in civil cases. Milne v. Milne Construction Co. , 207 Or. App. 382, 389, 142 P.3d 475, rev. den. , 342 Or. 253, 149 P.3d 1212 (2006) (explaining that, when a contract is ambiguous, its meaning becomes ......
Request a trial to view additional results