Milton Point Realty Co., Inc. v. Haas
| Decision Date | 27 December 1982 |
| Parties | MILTON POINT REALTY CO., INC. et al., Appellants, v. Steven F. HAAS et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Michael S. Winokur, Jamaica, for appellants.
Kronish, Lieb, Shainswit, Weiner & Hellman, New York City (Mark G. O'Connor, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
Before DAMIANI, J.P., and LAZER, GULOTTA and BRACKEN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DARONCO, J.), dated March 30, 1982, which granted defendants' motion to strike plaintiffs' note of issue and statement of readiness and denied plaintiffs' cross motion, inter alia, for a trial preference.
Appeal from so much of the order as granted defendants' motion dismissed. The action has been restored to the tort calendar by a subsequent order of Special Term.
Order otherwise modified by adding thereto, after the provision denying the cross motion, the following: "except that the branch thereof which seeks a trial preference is granted." As so modified, order otherwise affirmed.
Plaintiffs are awarded $50 costs and disbursements.
Shortly after the plaintiff corporation received a $240,000 purchase money mortgage from the defendants, it assigned $8,000 of the mortgage to its attorney, plaintiff Winokur, as payment of part of his legal fees. In this action to foreclose the mortgage, plaintiffs cross-moved, inter alia, for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (subd. [a], par. 4), since Winokur has reached the age of 70. Special Term denied that relief on the ground that Winokur is not the real party in interest within the meaning of that statute. We disagree.
A party who has reached 70 years of age is automatically entitled to a preference under CPLR 3403 (subd. [a], par. 4) (see N.Y. Legis. Ann., 1970, pp. 14-15; Siegel, 1970 Supplemental Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 7B [1981-1982 Supp.], CPLR 3403, p. 20; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac., par. 3403.18). Notwithstanding the fact that Winokur's interest in the mortgage is only a small portion of the total amount, plaintiffs are entitled to a preference based on his age, since he possesses a recognizable cause of action (see Bobowski v. Toomey, 108 Misc.2d 1061, 439 N.Y.S.2d 239). This conclusion is consistent with the intent of CPLR 3403 to afford an elderly party swifter access to the courts so that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jacobs v. Carter
... ... D.2d 425, 668 N.Y.S.2d 949 [2d Dept 1998]; Milton ... Point Realty Co., Inc. v Haas, 91 A.D.2d ... ...
-
EFCO-FA Development Corp. v. State
...392, 300 N.Y.S.2d 830, 248 N.E.2d 585; cf., Borenstein v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 425, 668 N.Y.S.2d 949; Milton Point Realty Co. v. Haas, 91 A.D.2d 678, 457 N.Y.S.2d 333; Bobowski v. Toomey, 108 Misc.2d 1061, 439 N.Y.S.2d 239) and is not the real party in interest (see, Chalmers v. Eat......
-
Borenstein v. City of New York
...Therefore, under CPLR 3403(a)(4), the plaintiffs are automatically entitled to a special trial preference (see, Milton Point Realty Co. v. Haas, 91 A.D.2d 678, 457 N.Y.S.2d 333; Bobowski v. Toomey, 108 Misc.2d 1061, 439 N.Y.S.2d 239; cf., Longo v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S., 100 Mis......