Mims v. State
Decision Date | 07 October 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 26509,26509 |
Citation | 159 Tex.Crim. 180,261 S.W.2d 727 |
Parties | MIMS v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
No attorney on appeal for appellant.
Wesley Dice, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
The offense is murder; the penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 12 years.
In the brief of the State's Attorney, the facts are summarized as follows:
The record presents only one formal bill of exception, which complains of the action of the trial court in sustaining the State's objection to certain questions propounded to the appellant's witness, Fred W. Calloway,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Goodman v. State
...surprise, it is incumbent that the party also show that the witness' testimony is injurious to his cause. Mims v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 180, 261 S.W.2d 727 (1953); Butcher v. State, 104 Tex.Cr.R. 464, 284 S.W. 219 (1926). It is not sufficient that the witness merely fails to testify as expec......
-
Wall v. State, 40473
...cannot attack his or her testimony unless the witness has stated facts injurious to such party. Article 38.28, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Mims v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 180, 261 S.W.2d 727. It is not sufficient that the witness merely fails to testify as expected or to remember facts favorable to th......
-
Wood v. State
...or her testimony Unless the witness has stated facts injurious to such party. Article 38.28, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Mims v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 180, 261 S.W.2d 727 (1953); Wall v. State, 417 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Norwood v. State, 486 S.W.2d 776 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Zanders v. State......
-
Lewis v. State
...Wall v. State, 417 S.W.2d 59 (1967); Crandall v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 229, 340 S.W.2d 36 (1960) and Mims v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 180, 261 S.W.2d 727 (1953)." In the instant case, as in Smith v. State, supra, we cannot say that Walker ever testified to facts Injurious to the State's case. We......