Minnesota C. R. Co. v. Melvin
Decision Date | 01 March 1875 |
Citation | 21 Minn. 339 |
Parties | Minnesota Central Railway Company v. B. F. Melvin, County Treasurer, and another |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Steele county, Lord, J., presiding, refusing to dissolve an injunction.
The order denying the defendants' motion to dissolve the temporary injunction allowed in this case, affirmed.
Amos Coggswell and J. M. Burlingame, for appellants.
Gordon E. Cole, for respondent.
This is an action in which it is sought to enjoin the collection of certain taxes, and to set aside the assessments of the same. Without entering into details, it will be sufficient to refer to First Division St. P. & P. R. Co. v Parcher, 14 Minn. 297, and to Huff v Winona & St. P. R Co., 11 Minn. 180, and to add that, mutatis mutandis, proceedings similar to those of which a history is given in the opinions of the court in those cases, were taken in the case of the Minneapolis & Cedar Valley R. Co., the result being that the plaintiff, The Minnesota Central Railway Co., under the congressional Land Grant Act of March 3, 1857, (11 Stat. at Large, ch. 99,) and other acts of congress, under the Five Million Loan Amendment to our state constitution, and under the following acts of the legislature of the Territory or State of Minnesota, viz., ch. 1, Laws 1857, Extra Sess.; ch. 17, Sp. Laws 1862; ch. 2, Sp. Laws 1864; ch. 5, Sp. Laws 1865, succeeded to the rights, benefits, privileges, property, franchises and interests of the Minneapolis & Cedar Valley Railroad Co., and among other things, to the lands upon which the taxes in question are assessed, and to the immunity of said lands from taxation, as provided in § 9, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1, Laws 1857, Ex. Sess. Said § 9 enacts that the lands aforesaid, with others, "shall be and are exempt from all taxation, until the same shall have been sold and conveyed by the said company," (the M. & C. V. R. Co.) By § 6, ch. 17, Sp. Laws 1862, it is further enacted that the same "shall be and hereby are exempted from all assessments and from all taxation whatsoever, until the same shall have been sold and conveyed by the said company, or until said company shall contract to sell the said lands."
Defendants contend that the taxes in question should be sustained, because the plaintiff has sold and conveyed the lands upon which the same were assessed. Whether such sale and conveyance have been made, is the only question necessary to be considered in this case. The facts bearing upon the question are as follows: On June 22, 1867, the plaintiff, by deed (Exhibit A) duly executed, granted and conveyed to the McGregor Western Railway Co. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial