Minter v. State
Decision Date | 19 April 1924 |
Docket Number | 4060. |
Citation | 123 S.E. 23,158 Ga. 127 |
Parties | MINTER v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The evidence was sufficient to authorize a charge on the law of confessions.
The act of the Legislature creating the county of Coweta (Acts 1826 p. 57) extended the territory of that county eastward to the east bank of (formerly) the principal western branch of Flint river (now) "Line creek," including the whole of the bed of that stream. The venue for trial of crimes committed on the waters of that stream is in Coweta county.
(a) The provisions of Penal Code 1910, § 23, conferring jurisdiction for criminal trials in either of two counties, where the crime was committed on a stream that is the boundary between the counties and the evidence does not clearly disclose in which county the crime was committed, do not apply to the counties of Coweta and Fayette as to crimes committed on Line creek.
(b) While the instruction giving Pen. Code 1910, § 23, in charge to the jury was inapt, as the evidence bearing upon the question of venue demanded the verdict that was rendered, any error in giving the charge is not cause for a reversal.
(c) No ruling will be made on the assignment of error as to constitutionality of section 23 of the Penal Code of 1910.
The judge did not err in omitting to charge the law relating to involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act.
The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the judge did not err in refusing a new trial.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
A "confession" is a voluntary statement made by a person charged with the commission of a crime, wherein he acknowledges himself to be guilty of the offense charged.
Error from Superior Court, Coweta County; C. E. Roop, Judge.
Grady Minter was convicted of murder, and he brings error. Affirmed.
Grady Minter and his father, J. W. Minter, and others were jointly indicted in Coweta county for the murder of Millard Trouten alleged to have been committed in that county. Grady Minter hereinafter called the defendant, was placed on separate trial and found guilty, the jury recommending him to the mercy of the court. He made a motion for a new trial upon the general grounds, and upon alleged error in the charge of the court on the subjects of venue and confessions, and upon the omission to charge the law of involuntary manslaughter as it related to the killing of a human being in the commission of an unlawful act. The motion for new trial was overruled, and the defendant excepted.
The evidence at the trial, in so far as necessary to be stated, tended to show the following:
Arnold's bridge extended over Line creek on the public road between Senoia, in Coweta county, and Fayetteville, in Fayette county. The bridge had an arch at the center, and was about 90 feet long. The creek was about 60 feet wide at the bridge. The victim was seized at night in the city of Newnan, in Coweta county, and carried in an automobile to the bridge. The automobile stopped in Coweta county, near the end of the bridge, and the victim was taken out. He was then carried to the center of the bridge, and with his legs and hands bound with a rope and his body weighted with a rock tied at the chest was thrown into the creek. It was thought that the victim was heard swimming, and the defendant, with one of his codefendants, went below the bridge on the Fayette side and struck matches to see if "he had sunk," while two other defendants did likewise on the Coweta side. Nothing was seen or heard of him, and the defendants left in the automobile. Several days later the body in a badly decomposed condition was found in the stream about 100 yards below the bridge. The body was lying face downward, with head upstream, the back and shoulders being out of the water, and the face, feet, and hands under the water. After the body was found the defendant was arrested and charged with the murder. After this arrest and charge he made a statement "concerning the death of Millard Trouten." The statement was reduced to writing and signed by the defendant, and was as follows:
Testimony of a deputy sheriff as to other statements was as follows:
The sheriff testified to similar statements made to him.
In his statement before the jury the defendant said, in part:
"So from there we went on to Line creek. If there was anything said regarding harming the boy, I don't know it. When we got down there Pa and them got out, and this boy he got out also. So Pa he says, 'Lay down, boy; lay down.' He tied a rope around his legs, and he started to shoot him. He says, 'Well, I am going to kill him, boy.' I commenced begging my father not to kill him, because I knew that would get us into trouble if he killed him. I knowed we would get into trouble. Pa was heat up about the way the boy treated my sister. He had beaten her up. He says, 'I am going to end my troubles between him and I.' I...
To continue reading
Request your trial