Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Sasse
Decision Date | 03 May 1893 |
Citation | 22 S.W. 187 |
Parties | MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO. v. SASSE. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Williamson county; W. M. Key, Judge.
Action by Amiel Sasse against the International & Great Northern Railroad Company and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company for damages for personal injuries. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of the International & Great Northern Railroad Company against plaintiff, and in favor of plaintiff against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company for $2,500. From this judgment the Missouri Pacific Railway Company appeals. Affirmed.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by COLLARD, J.:
The statement of the nature and result of the suit made by appellant, and accepted by appellee, is as follows: Suit by Amiel Sasse against the International & Great Northern Railroad Company and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, in the district court of Williamson county, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him on the 29th day of January, 1886, through the negligence of the defendant companies, while in their employ as a laborer in the roundhouse at Taylor. The allegation is that he was injured by the falling of a door which had been negligently allowed to get out of repair. The International & Great Northern Railroad Company denied that it had any control over the roundhouse at the time of the accident, and plaintiff's counsel admitted that, at the time, the roundhouse was under the exclusive control of the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, as lessee, and that plaintiff was at such time an employe of that company. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company interposed to plaintiff's petition a general demurrer and general denial, and, specially answering, set up the defense of contributory negligence on plaintiff's part. Trial before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment, based on conclusions of fact and of law found and stated by the court, in favor of the International & Great Northern Railroad Company against the plaintiff, and in favor of the plaintiff against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company for $2,500 and costs. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company has appealed.
The court filed conclusions of fact and law, (excepted to by appellant,) which are as follows:
Conclusions of fact: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Malott v. Sample
...States Rolling Stock Co. v. Weir, 96 Ala. 396, 11 South. 436;Indianapolis, etc., R. Co. v. Flanigan, 77 Ill. 365;Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Sasse (Tex. Civ. App. 1893) 22 S. W. 187; 20 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 94. See Lake Shore, etc., R. Co. v. Stupak, 123 Ind. 210, 23 N. E. 246. The remainin......
-
Malott v. Sample
... ... Ala. 396, 11 So. 436; Indianapolis, etc., R. Co. v ... Flanigan (1875), 77 Ill. 365; Missouri Pac. R ... Co. v. Sasse (1893) (Tex. Civ. App.), 22 S.W ... 187; 20 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law (2d ... ...
- International & G. N. R. Co. v. Wolf