Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Dennis
Decision Date | 21 December 1942 |
Docket Number | 4-6868 |
Citation | 166 S.W.2d 886,205 Ark. 28 |
Parties | MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, v. DENNIS, ADM'R |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from White Circuit Court; E. M. Pipkin, Judge; reversed.
Judgment reversed and cause dismissed.
Thomas B. Pryor, H. L. Ponder, Jr., and H. L. Ponder, for appellant.
John Ferguson and Yingling & Yingling, for appellee.
Appellee 's intestate, Isaac Dennis, was killed instantly at a railroad crossing in Garner, Arkansas, at about 1 o'clock a. m., October 5, 1941. Suit was filed by appellee to recover damages in the amount of $ 500, as administrator for the benefit of the estate, and $ 2,500 in his own right.
The negligent acts alleged in the complaint were failure of appellants to give the statutory signals, that the train in question was operated at a high and excessive rate of speed failure to keep proper lookout and that the train was not equipped with a proper headlight. The answer denied every material allegation in the complaint, and in addition specifically pleaded the contributory negligence of Isaac Dennis, as a complete bar to recovery. A jury returned a verdict for the estate in the amount of $ 75, and for $ 425 for appellee in his own right. From the judgment on this verdict comes this appeal.
The principal ground upon which appellants rely for reversal is that there was no substantial evidence upon which to base the jury's verdict and, therefore, that the trial court, at the conclusion of all the testimony, erred in refusing appellant's request to so instruct the jury.
In our opinion, appellant is correct in this contention.
Viewing the evidence in its most favorable light to appellee, as we must do, it is to the following effect: At about 1 o'clock in the morning of October 5, 1941, appellee's intestate, in company with Miss Thelma Scott, and his brother, Charlie Dennis, drove his 1929 Chevrolet sedan automobile on appellant's track on a crossing in Garner, Arkansas, when it was struck by one of appellant's troop-trains from the southwest, traveling at approximately 65 miles per hour. The crossing where the collision occurred is practically level. The automobile approached from the east side of the crossing. The railroad track southwest of the crossing is straight for more than a mile and the view was unobstructed. When appellee's intestate reached a point about fifty feet from this crossing he stopped his car and looked and listened. Appellee's witnesses testified, in effect, that the statutory signals (ringing the bell or blowing the whistle) were not given (§ 11135, Pope's Digest); and although this evidence is contradicted, we must assume that the signals were not given. There was no evidence that Isaac Dennis continued to look during the time he negotiated the distance of approximately fifty feet from the point where he stopped his car to the point of collision on the track.
Charlie Dennis, brother of Isaac Dennis, testified that before his brother attempted to cross the track he brought the car "practically to a stop." Witness looked in both directions and thinks his brother, Isaac, did likewise. He didn't see or hear the oncoming train and heard no signals. He was asked, "Did you see the headlight of the train?" and answered, "Yes, I think I saw a glimpse of it as it hit."
Thelma Scott was riding on the front seat with Isaac, at the time, and testified that Isaac stopped the car "about fifty feet from the railroad track." She was asked: "From that point, could you see up and down the railroad track?" and answered "yes, sir." She further testified that Isaac looked to the south and that she looked in both directions and also listened. She did not see or hear the train and heard no signals. She was asked: "What was the first thing you saw or heard?" and answered,
Ossie Fecher testified that at the time of the collision he was riding in his automobile in company with Cecil Price, Eugene Todd and Rat Daily from Searcy to Beebe along highway 67, and that he was "all the way from half a mile to a mile" from the crossing when the collision occurred; that he heard the "toot-toot" of the train which made him look. He had heard no whistle up to that time. We quote from his testimony. He further testified that he could see the headlight "as far as your eye would let you."
Cecil Price, who was in the car with Ossie Fecher, testified (quoting from his testimony):
Appellant's engineer, W. F. Gresham, testified that he was keeping a lookout as the train approached this crossing, and saw the automobile when the train reached a point between six and eight hundred feet from the crossing; that he saw the automobile approaching and it momentarily slowed up and eased up to the crossing. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brist v. Kurn
...equal to or greater than that of the employees of the defendants, and Instruction No. B should have been given. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Dennis, 166 S.W.2d 886 (Ark.); Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Carruthers, 162 S.W.2d 912 (Ark.); Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Howard, 161 S.W.2d 759 (Ark.); Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Do......
-
Tepel v. Thompson
... ... dangerous, unreasonable and negligent speed. Missouri ... Pac. R. Co. v. Baldwin, 117 F.2d 510. (2) There was no ... proof of ... Howard, 204 Ark. 253, 161 ... S.W.2d 759; Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Dennis, 205 Ark ... 28, 166 S.W.2d 886. (5) Plaintiff's injuries were caused ... the jury and not a question of law for the court ... Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Shell, 208 Ark. 70, ... 185 S.W.2d 81; Missouri Pacific ... ...
-
Koch v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 5-5294
...Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company v. Sullivan, 193 Ark. 491, 101 S.W.2d 175 (1937); and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Dennis, 205 Ark. 28, 166 S.W.2d 886 (1942). Consequently an instruction is not inherently erroneous when it tells a jury under what circumstances the fai......
-
Tepel v. Thompson, 40777.
...& Arkansas Ry. Co. v. Smith, 133 F. (2d) 436; Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Howard, 204 Ark. 253, 161 S.W. (2d) 759; Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Dennis, 205 Ark. 28, 166 S.W. (2d) 886. (5) Plaintiff's injuries were caused by and due solely to his own negligence. Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Dennis, 205 Ar......