Mitchell v. State, 98-1938

Decision Date29 October 1998
Docket NumberNo. 98-1938,98-1938
Citation719 So.2d 1258
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D2436 Ronald Patrick MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Kim A. Skievaski, Judge.

Ronald Patrick Mitchell, Appellant, pro se.

Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. This court therefore has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court's disposition of the motion. See Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

BARFIELD, C.J., and ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • McCarthan v. Jones
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • October 18, 2017
    ...(Ex. O). The state circuit court denied the motion on August 20, 2012. (Id.). The order was not appealable. See Mitchell v. State, 719 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that a Rule 3.800(c) motion "is addressed to the discretion of the trial court; thus, an appellate court "has no ju......
  • Fine v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 11, 2021
    ...The trial court denied the motion on the merits. And thus, that decision is not subject to appellate review. See Mitchell v. State , 719 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that a rule 3.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that an appellate cour......
  • Baez v. State, 1D13–0823.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 2013
    ...denied the Petitioner's motion on the merits. That merits determination is not reviewable by this Court. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 719 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that a rule 3.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that the appellate co......
  • Barrington v. State Of Fla., CASE NO. 1D10-3751
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 25, 2010
    ...and it is well-settled that an order denying a rule 3.800(c) motion on the merits is not appealable. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 719 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that a rule 3.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that the appellate court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT