Mitchem v. State, 25341.
Decision Date | 24 April 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 25341.,25341. |
Parties | MITCHEM. v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; G. H. Howard, Judge.
Golden Mitchem was convicted of stealing an automobile and of changing and altering the automobile for the purpose of concealing its identity, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
Statement of Facts by MacIntyre, J.
Testimony for the state in effect shows that six days after the theft of the automobile it was found in an automobile paint shop, where the defendant, Golden Mitchem, had left it to be repainted a different color, and the painting had been partly done when it was found. The car did not actually need repainting. Shortly before, this defendant had left another car in this paint shop which apparently did not need to be repainted and which the de-fendant had left there to be repainted a different color. The motor number on the car stolen in the instant case had been changed and altered. The trunk on the back of the body was gone. The frame had been changed. The defendant had concealed from the officers the identity of the man from whom he claimed he had bought the car, and declared that he did not know who the person was. One police officer testified that the defendant said: The defendant in his statement to the jury said in part: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bentley v. State, 48573
...may believe the evidence which they think is most entitled to belief. Ford v. State, 92 Ga. 459, 461, 17 S.E. 667.' Mitchem v. State, 53 Ga.App. 280, 281, 185 S.E. 367, 368. 4. Under the general grounds defendant argues that contradictions on material facts as between the various State witn......