MITSUBISHI MATERIALS v. SC

Decision Date24 September 2003
Docket NumberNo. S114470.,S114470.
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesMITSUBISHI MATERIALS v. S.C. (Dillman).

David Seabold Casey Jr., Casey Gerry Casey Westbrook Johnson Reed & Hughes, Bonnie E. Kane, Casey Gerry Reed & Schenk, San Diego, CA, James Willard Parkinson, Attorney at Law, Palm Desert, CA, Michael Goldstein, Law Offices Of Michael Goldstein, Cardiff, CA, Venus Soltan, Soltan & Associates, Costa Mesa, CA, for Real Party in Interest.

Brett Johnston Williamson, O'Melveny and Myers LLP., Newport Beach, CA, John H. Beisner, O'Melveny and Myers LLP, Washington, DC, Arne D. Wagner, John Armstrong Kelley, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, H. Mark Mersel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Irvine, CA, Arne D. Wagner, San Francisco, CA, Barbara L. Croutch, Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, David M. Balabanian, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, CA, Matthew Edward Digby, Bingham McCutchen LLP, for Petitioners.

Prior report: Cal.App., 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 734.

Transferred to CA 4/3 after hold

The above-entitled review is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of American Ins. Ass'n v. Garamendi (2003) 539 U.S. 396, 123 S.Ct. 2374,156 L.Ed.2d 376. GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT