Mobley v. Fulton Roofing Co.
Decision Date | 27 February 1985 |
Docket Number | Nos. 69081,69082,s. 69081 |
Citation | 327 S.E.2d 540,173 Ga.App. 563 |
Parties | MOBLEY v. FULTON ROOFING COMPANY. FULTON ROOFING COMPANY v. MOBLEY. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
L. Spencer Gandy, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
Ezra B. Jones, W. Dennis Summers, Atlanta, for appellee.
Plaintiff Richard Mobley brought this action against defendant Fulton Roofing Company, plaintiff's former employer, seeking to recover an unspecified sum allegedly due him as part of his compensation. Defendant denied plaintiff's claim and filed a counterclaim alleging in Count I plaintiff's tortious interference with defendant's business, and in Count II that plaintiff was mistakenly overpaid upon his leaving defendant's employ. Defendant moved for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim and Count II of its counterclaim, and, following a hearing on the matter, the trial court granted the motion as to plaintiff's claim against defendant and denied the motion as to defendant's counterclaim. Case No. 69081 is plaintiff's appeal from the grant of summary judgment against him on his claim against defendant. Case No. 69082 is defendant's cross-appeal from the denial of summary judgment on Count II of its counterclaim against plaintiff.
1. The trial court made the following findings of fact: In an affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant averred that this check was "for all of the commissions due [plaintiff] through December 31, 1982," and that no further commissions are yet due plaintiff for 1983. At the April 1983 meeting plaintiff was given a ledger sheet which showed how the amount of his final commission check was computed. The ledger sheet showed deductions as per defendant's definition of "net profit." The plaintiff accepted this final check, albeit "reluctantly."
It has long been the law in this state that "[w]hen a creditor receives and retains a sum of money from his debtor less than the amount actually due him with the understanding, either express or implied, that it is received by him in satisfaction of his claim or demand, he cannot thereafter treat it as a nullity and recover the balance, and this is so whether his claim or demand be disputed or undisputed, liquidated or unliquidated...." Rivers v. Cole Corp., 209 Ga. 406, 73 S.E.2d 196 (1952). Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Southeastern Ventilating, 159 Ga.App. 443, 445-46, 283 S.E.2d 660 (1981). However, when the movant for summary judgment on this issue presents evidence which...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rhone v. State Auto Mut. Ins. Co.
...142 (1970); American Viking Contractors, Inc. v. Scribner Equip. Co., 745 F.2d 1365, 1369 (11th Cir.1984); Mobley v. Fulton Roofing Co., 173 Ga.App. 563, 327 S.E.2d 540, 542 (1985). "Once the moving party has sufficiently supported [the] motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must ......
-
Sunbelt Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of Alapaha
...deductions withheld from security deposit and issued pursuant to special statutory provisions in that regard). Mobley v. Fulton Roofing Co., 173 Ga.App. 563, 327 S.E.2d 540 (1985) (accord and satisfaction not based solely on language of check). There is no evidence of a pre-existing bona fi......
-
NationsBank, N.A. (South) v. Peavy
...well as an accord and satisfaction resolving any dispute over any deficiency under the first note. See also Mobley v. Fulton Roofing Co., 173 Ga.App. 563, 564(1), 327 S.E.2d 540. 4. Additionally, defendant's reliance upon the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., is ......
-
Decision One Mortgage Co. v. Victor Warren Properties Inc
...Jenkins v. Sallie Mae, Inc., 286 Ga.App. 502, 504(3), 649 S.E.2d 802 (2007) (footnote omitted); see also Mobley v. Fulton Roofing Co., 173 Ga.App. 563, 565(2), 327 S.E.2d 540 (1985) (defendant, having reached an accord and satisfaction with plaintiff, could not, in the absence of fraud or u......