Mock v. Mock

Citation369 S.E.2d 255,258 Ga. 407
Decision Date23 June 1988
Docket NumberNo. 45658,45658
PartiesMOCK v. MOCK.
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

Joseph D. McGovern, Dubberly & McGovern, Glennville, for Mary Carol mock.

John E. Pirkle, Hinesville, for Robert Daniel Mock.

PER CURIAM.

In this case the trial court found both parents equally fit to raise the minor child. However, the trial court granted custody of the child to the father because of his further finding that the mother was at fault in causing the divorce by her adulterous conduct. The trial court's ruling was based on OCGA § 19-9-1(a) which provides in part: "In all cases in which a divorce is granted, the party not in default shall be entitled to the custody of the minor children of the marriage." However, this part of the statute is overridden by the rule that "[a]s between parents the right of custody depends upon what will promote the welfare of the children." Gunnells v. Gunnells, 225 Ga. 188, 189(1), 167 S.E.2d 138 (1969).

While the trial court may consider the conduct of the parties on the issue of custody, see Harris v. Harris, 240 Ga. 276, 277, 240 S.E.2d 30 (1977), the court ultimately must decide the custody question based on the best interest of the child.

We remand the case to the trial court for further consideration of the custody question in light of this opinion. See Lifsey v. Lifsey, 256 Ga. 613, 351 S.E.2d 637 (1987).

Case remanded.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Todd v. Todd
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 1 Junio 2010
    ...of custody, [cit.], the court ultimately must decide the custody question based on the best interest of the child.” Mock v. Mock, 258 Ga. 407, 369 S.E.2d 255 (1988). Indeed, “ ‘the welfare of the child is the controlling factor in the court's determination of custody.’ Taylor v. Taylor, 280......
  • Todd v. Todd.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 28 Junio 2010
    ...issue of custody, [cit.], the court ultimately must decide the custody question based on the best interest of the child.” Mock v. Mock, 258 Ga. 407, 369 S.E.2d 255 (1988). Indeed, “ ‘the welfare of the child is the controlling factor in the court's determination of custody.’ [Cits.]” Taylor......
  • Neal v. Hibbard
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 16 Marzo 2015
    ...the child, a court may consider the conduct of the parents. Patel v. Patel, 276 Ga. 266, 267–269(1), 577 S.E.2d 587 (2003) ; Mock v. Mock, 258 Ga. 407, 369 S.E.2d 255 (1988). As the trial court noted, there was evidence of the notoriety produced by Neal's conduct, and the effects thereof, i......
  • Patel v. Patel
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 24 Febrero 2003
    ...on the best interests of the children, but may also consider the conduct of the parties in making its determination. Mock v. Mock, 258 Ga. 407, 369 S.E.2d 255 (1988). Although the trial court must exercise its discretion in determining what is in the best interest of the child, "the party t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Domestic Relations - Barry B. Mcgough and Gregory R. Miller
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 55-1, September 2003
    • Invalid date
    ...(1993). 20. 260 Ga. App. at 514, 580 S.E.2d at 299. 21. Patel v. Patel, 276 Ga. 266, 268, 577 S.E.2d 587, 589 (2003) (citing Mock v. Mock, 258 Ga. 407, 369 S.E.2d 233 (1988)). 22. 276 Ga. 266, 577 S.E.2d 587 (2003). 23. Id. at 268, 577 S.E.2d at 590. 24. Id. at 266-68, 577 S.E.2d at 587-89;......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT