Mohammed v. Islip Food Corp.

Decision Date19 December 2005
Docket Number2004-01981.
Citation24 A.D.3d 634,808 N.Y.S.2d 389,2005 NY Slip Op 09694
PartiesDAVID MOHAMMED, Appellant, v. ISLIP FOOD CORP., Doing Business as C-TOWN SUPERMARKET, et al., Respondents, 2-32C WHEELER ROAD, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendant Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket, payable by the defendant 2-32 Wheeler Road, Inc., and one bill of costs to the defendants Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket, Sam Infantino Wholesale Produce, Inc., and Krasdale Foods, Inc., payable by the plaintiff, upon searching the record, summary judgment is awarded to the defendant Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket, dismissing the cross claim of the defendant 2-32C Wheeler Road, Inc., for common-law indemnification insofar as asserted against it, and so much of the order as denied that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket, which was for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim of the defendant 2-32C Wheeler Road, Inc. for common-law indemnification insofar as asserted against it is vacated, that branch of that cross motion is granted, and the cross claim of the defendant 2-32C Wheeler Road, Inc., for common-law indemnification insofar as asserted against the defendant Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket is dismissed.

The defendant 2-32C Wheeler Road, Inc. (hereinafter the landlord), leased premises to the defendant Islip Food Corp., doing business as C-Town Supermarket (hereinafter C-Town), which C-Town operated as a supermarket. C-Town contracted with the plaintiff's employer, Your Town Cesspool Plumbing and Heating Corp. (hereinafter Your Town), for the installation of an auxiliary cesspool on the premises. To install the auxiliary cesspool tank, on the afternoon of July 2, 1999, the plaintiff and another employee of Your Town, Richard Baldwin, dug a trench near a loading dock platform used by trucks to make deliveries to C-Town. The plaintiff and Baldwin placed red safety cones around the trench so that no one would walk or drive in the immediate area. The plaintiff was then lowered into the unshored trench using the bucket of a backhoe, which Baldwin was operating approximately four feet from the edge of the trench. While in the trench, the plaintiff used a steel sledgehammer to make a hole in the existing cesspool, and then laid a new pipe. As the plaintiff was working, one wall of the trench collapsed, burying him up to his waist and allegedly causing injuries to his knees.

The plaintiff commenced the instant action, alleging, inter alia, that delivery trucks operated by certain of the defendants, including Krasdale Foods, Inc. (hereinafter Krasdale), and Sam Infantino Wholesale Produce, Inc. (hereinafter Infantino), were permitted to operate and remain with their engines idling for an extended period of time in proximity to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Smith v. The City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 28, 2018
    ... ... A.D.2d 908 [3dDept 1998];Bauer v. Niagara Mohawk Power ... Corp., 249 A.D.2d 948 [4 th Dept 1998]; ... Gavigan v. Bunkoff Gen ... ,128 A.D.3d ... 629,630 [2d Dept 2015]; Rallo v. Man-Dell Food Stores, ... Inc., 117 A.D.3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2014]; Stasiak v ... Rous. Preser v. & Dev., 16 A.D.3d 461 ... [2d Dept 2005]; cf. Mohammed vis lip Food Corp., 24 ... A.D.3d 634, 636-637 [2d Dept 2005]) ... [2d Dept 2006]; cf. Mohammed v. Islip Food Corp., 24 ... A.D.3d 634, 636-637 [2d Dept 2005]; see Kader v ... ...
  • Mayer v. Conrad
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2014
    ...A.D.3d 933, 934–935, 938 N.Y.S.2d 146 ; Soskin v. Scharff, 309 A.D.2d 1102, 1105–1106, 766 N.Y.S.2d 248 ; cf. Mohammed v. Islip Food Corp., 24 A.D.3d 634, 635–638, 808 N.Y.S.2d 389 ). We therefore conclude that the court properly denied those parts of the motions of defendants and Fisher se......
  • 492 Kings Realty, LLC v. 506 Kings, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 24, 2013
    ...was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs' injuries ( see Lisi v. Coco, 31 A.D.3d 615, 616, 819 N.Y.S.2d 95;Mohammed v. Islip Food Corp., 24 A.D.3d 634, 637, 808 N.Y.S.2d 389). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to SSI's contention, the Supreme......
  • Lopez-Oviedo v. Marvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 27, 2012
    ...Island, and the duty created by that statute is not a basis on which to award indemnification. See Mohammed v. Islip Food Corp., 24 A.D.3d 634, 637-38, 808 N.Y.S.2d 389, 392 (2d Dep't 2005) (explaining in dicta that a defendant whose only potential liability was statutory and who was not "a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT